» Articles » PMID: 18279870

Self-approximating Transluminal Access Technique for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: a Porcine Survival Study (with Video)

Overview
Date 2008 Feb 19
PMID 18279870
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ability to access the abdominal cavity though a direct (modified-PEG type) gastric incision to perform natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been demonstrated in the literature. However, the optimal technique to access the abdomen remains unknown.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel.

Design: Animal feasibility study.

Interventions: Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy was performed in 7 anesthetized swine, including 2 acute and 5 survival animals. After the creation of a 10-cm to 12-cm tunnel in the gastric submucosal plane, the peritoneal cavity was accessed by needle-knife puncture through the gastric wall near the greater curvature. The peritoneal cavity was examined before the gastric mucosal incision was closed with endoclips. Survival animals were euthanized two weeks after the procedure, and a necropsy was performed.

Results: The abdominal cavity was successfully entered without complication in all 7 animals. The mucosal incisions were able to be closed by endoscopy. In the survival experiments, all animals recovered and gained weight. Two animals experienced clinically unapparent infectious complications.

Limitations: Small sample size.

Conclusions: A peroral transgastric approach to the abdominal cavity through an extended submucosal tunnel is technically feasible and allows safe abdominal access and reliable closure with currently available technology. It has potential benefits as an alternative to direct transgastric access for NOTES procedures.

Citing Articles

Esophageal bronchogenic cyst treated with submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: two case reports.

Sha H, Jiang Z J Med Case Rep. 2024; 18(1):139.

PMID: 38561839 PMC: 10986053. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04453-y.


Endoscopic full thickness resection versus submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for removal of submucosal tumors: a review article.

Dellatore P, Bhagat V, Kahaleh M Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4:45.

PMID: 31304422 PMC: 6624346. DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.05.03.


Prospective randomized comparison of gastrotomy closure associating tunnel access and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) with two other methods in an experimental ex vivo setting.

Gonzalez J, Saito K, Kang C, Gromski M, Sawhney M, Chuttani R Endosc Int Open. 2015; 3(1):E83-9.

PMID: 26134780 PMC: 4423288. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390794.


Impact of cosmetic result on selection of surgical treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Egui Rojo M, Martinez-Salamanca J, Alvarez Maestro M, Galarza I, Carballido Rodriguez J JSLS. 2014; 18(4).

PMID: 25516703 PMC: 4266226. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00024.


The rise of tunnel endoscopic surgery: a case report and literature review.

Cai M, Chen J, Zhou P, Yao L Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2012; 2012:847640.

PMID: 22988531 PMC: 3439945. DOI: 10.1155/2012/847640.