» Articles » PMID: 18267904

Generating Carbon Finance Through Avoided Deforestation and Its Potential to Create Climatic, Conservation and Human Development Benefits

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Feb 13
PMID 18267904
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent proposals to compensate developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation (RED) under forthcoming climate change mitigation regimes are receiving increasing attention. Here we demonstrate that if RED credits were traded on international carbon markets, even moderate decreases in deforestation rates could generate billions of Euros annually for tropical forest conservation. We also discuss the main challenges for a RED mechanism that delivers real climatic benefits. These include providing sufficient incentives while only rewarding deforestation reductions beyond business-as-usual scenarios, addressing risks arising from forest degradation and international leakage, and ensuring permanence of emission reductions. Governance may become a formidable challenge for RED because some countries with the highest RED potentials score poorly on governance indices. In addition to climate mitigation, RED funds could help achieve substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation and human development. However, this will probably require targeted additional support because the highest biodiversity threats and human development needs may exist in countries that have limited income potentials from RED. In conclusion, how successfully a market-based RED mechanism can contribute to climate change mitigation, conservation and development will strongly depend on accompanying measures and carefully designed incentive structures involving governments, business, as well as the conservation and development communities.

Citing Articles

From poverty trap to ecosystem service curse.

Kronenberg J, Hubacek K Sustain Sci. 2018; 11(6):903-907.

PMID: 30174746 PMC: 6106373. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0370-8.


Identifying Where REDD+ Financially Out-Competes Oil Palm in Floodplain Landscapes Using a Fine-Scale Approach.

Abram N, MacMillan D, Xofis P, Ancrenaz M, Tzanopoulos J, Ong R PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0156481.

PMID: 27276218 PMC: 4898686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156481.


Turning the tide: how blue carbon and payments for ecosystem services (PES) might help save mangrove forests.

Locatelli T, Binet T, Kairo J, King L, Madden S, Patenaude G Ambio. 2014; 43(8):981-95.

PMID: 24817088 PMC: 4235902. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0530-y.


Carbon pools recover more quickly than plant biodiversity in tropical secondary forests.

Martin P, Newton A, Bullock J Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1773):20132236.

PMID: 24197410 PMC: 3826225. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2236.


Can joint carbon and biodiversity management in tropical agroforestry landscapes be optimized?.

Kessler M, Hertel D, Jungkunst H, Kluge J, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47192.

PMID: 23077569 PMC: 3471943. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047192.


References
1.
Betts R, Malhi Y, Roberts J . The future of the Amazon: new perspectives from climate, ecosystem and social sciences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 363(1498):1729-35. PMC: 2367686. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0011. View

2.
Kintisch E . Carbon emissions. Improved monitoring of rainforests helps pierce haze of deforestation. Science. 2007; 316(5824):536-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.316.5824.536. View

3.
Smith R, Muir R, Walpole M, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N . Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature. 2003; 426(6962):67-70. DOI: 10.1038/nature02025. View

4.
Soares-Filho B, Nepstad D, Curran L, Cerqueira G, Garcia R, Ramos C . Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature. 2006; 440(7083):520-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature04389. View

5.
Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C, da Fonseca G, Kent J . Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403(6772):853-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002501. View