» Articles » PMID: 18266472

Comparing Patterns of Natural Selection Across Species Using Selective Signatures

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Feb 13
PMID 18266472
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Comparing gene expression profiles over many different conditions has led to insights that were not obvious from single experiments. In the same way, comparing patterns of natural selection across a set of ecologically distinct species may extend what can be learned from individual genome-wide surveys. Toward this end, we show how variation in protein evolutionary rates, after correcting for genome-wide effects such as mutation rate and demographic factors, can be used to estimate the level and types of natural selection acting on genes across different species. We identify unusually rapidly and slowly evolving genes, relative to empirically derived genome-wide and gene family-specific background rates for 744 core protein families in 30 gamma-proteobacterial species. We describe the pattern of fast or slow evolution across species as the "selective signature" of a gene. Selective signatures represent a profile of selection across species that is predictive of gene function: pairs of genes with correlated selective signatures are more likely to share the same cellular function, and genes in the same pathway can evolve in concert. For example, glycolysis and phenylalanine metabolism genes evolve rapidly in Idiomarina loihiensis, mirroring an ecological shift in carbon source from sugars to amino acids. In a broader context, our results suggest that the genomic landscape is organized into functional modules even at the level of natural selection, and thus it may be easier than expected to understand the complex evolutionary pressures on a cell.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Conservation in South African Indigenous Goat Ecotypes: A Review.

Magoro A, Mtileni B, Hadebe K, Zwane A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496874 PMC: 9735466. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233353.


Tracking Microbial Evolution in the Subseafloor Biosphere.

Anderson R mSystems. 2021; 6(4):e0073121.

PMID: 34402637 PMC: 8409735. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00731-21.


Evolutionary stasis of a deep subsurface microbial lineage.

Becraft E, Lau Vetter M, Bezuidt O, Brown J, Labonte J, Kauneckaite-Griguole K ISME J. 2021; 15(10):2830-2842.

PMID: 33824425 PMC: 8443664. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-021-00965-3.


In silico functional and evolutionary analyses of rubber oxygenases (RoxA and RoxB).

Sharma V, Mobeen F, Prakash T 3 Biotech. 2020; 10(9):376.

PMID: 32802718 PMC: 7406594. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02371-6.


Modeling Multispecies Gene Flow Dynamics Reveals the Unique Roles of Different Horizontal Gene Transfer Mechanisms.

Nazarian P, Tran F, Boedicker J Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2978.

PMID: 30564220 PMC: 6288448. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02978.


References
1.
Xu L, Chen H, Hu X, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Luo Z . Average gene length is highly conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and diverges only between the two kingdoms. Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 23(6):1107-8. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msk019. View

2.
Fay J, Wu C . Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000; 155(3):1405-13. PMC: 1461156. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405. View

3.
Whittam T, Ochman H, Selander R . Geographic components of linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 1983; 1(1):67-83. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040302. View

4.
Gutierrez-Rios R, Rosenblueth D, Loza J, Huerta A, Glasner J, Blattner F . Regulatory network of Escherichia coli: consistency between literature knowledge and microarray profiles. Genome Res. 2003; 13(11):2435-43. PMC: 403762. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1387003. View

5.
. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature. 2005; 437(7055):69-87. DOI: 10.1038/nature04072. View