» Articles » PMID: 18266216

Brain Responses to Auditory and Visual Stimulus Offset: Shared Representations of Temporal Edges

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Feb 13
PMID 18266216
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Edges are crucial for the formation of coherent objects from sequential sensory inputs within a single modality. Moreover, temporally coincident boundaries of perceptual objects across different sensory modalities facilitate crossmodal integration. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging in order to examine the neural basis of temporal edge detection across modalities. Onsets of sensory inputs are not only related to the detection of an edge but also to the processing of novel sensory inputs. Thus, we used transitions from input to rest (offsets) as convenient stimuli for studying the neural underpinnings of visual and acoustic edge detection per se. We found, besides modality-specific patterns, shared visual and auditory offset-related activity in the superior temporal sulcus and insula of the right hemisphere. Our data suggest that right hemispheric regions known to be involved in multisensory processing are crucial for detection of edges in the temporal domain across both visual and auditory modalities. This operation is likely to facilitate cross-modal object feature binding based on temporal coincidence.

Citing Articles

Multisensory integration operates on correlated input from unimodal transient channels.

Parise C, Ernst M Elife. 2025; 12.

PMID: 39841060 PMC: 11753778. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90841.


Gustatory Cortex Is Involved in Evidence Accumulation during Food Choice.

Ataei A, Amini A, Ghazizadeh A eNeuro. 2022; 9(3).

PMID: 35508371 PMC: 9121914. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0006-22.2022.


Visual and audiovisual effects of isochronous timing on visual perception and brain activity.

Marchant J, Driver J Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(6):1290-8.

PMID: 22508766 PMC: 3643713. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs095.


Musical training induces functional plasticity in human hippocampus.

Herdener M, Esposito F, di Salle F, Boller C, Hilti C, Habermeyer B J Neurosci. 2010; 30(4):1377-84.

PMID: 20107063 PMC: 3842475. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4513-09.2010.


An auditory region in the primate insular cortex responding preferentially to vocal communication sounds.

Remedios R, Logothetis N, Kayser C J Neurosci. 2009; 29(4):1034-45.

PMID: 19176812 PMC: 6665141. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4089-08.2009.


References
1.
SELTZER B, Cola M, Gutierrez C, Massee M, Weldon C, Cusick C . Overlapping and nonoverlapping cortical projections to cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey: double anterograde tracer studies. J Comp Neurol. 1996; 370(2):173-90. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960624)370:2<173::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-#. View

2.
Foxe J, Wylie G, Martinez A, Schroeder C, Javitt D, Guilfoyle D . Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 88(1):540-3. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.540. View

3.
McGurk H, Macdonald J . Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976; 264(5588):746-8. DOI: 10.1038/264746a0. View

4.
PENFIELD W, FAULK Jr M . The insula; further observations on its function. Brain. 1955; 78(4):445-70. DOI: 10.1093/brain/78.4.445. View

5.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962; 160:106-54. PMC: 1359523. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. View