Reallocation of Visual Attention
Overview
Affiliations
Attentional movement time was investigated within and across hemifields in a discrimination task in which retinal acuity was controlled. Ss discriminated targets in a two-alternative, forced-choice latency paradigm. In Experiments 1-3, costs were mediated by distance, even though it was varied independently of acuity. In Experiments 4 and 7, with distance held constant, costs were equivalent for crossing the vertical and horizontal meridians and for crossing 1 and 2 meridians. However, crossing 1 meridian produced costs that were less than the costs for shifts to unexpected locations in the same quadrant, partially replicating the inhibitory aftereffect of Tassinari, Aglioti,Chelazzi,Marzi,and Berlucchi (1987). An explanation based on a combination of analog movement (Tsal, 1983) and attentional distribution (Downing & Pinker, 1985; Hughes & Zimba, 1987; Tassinari et al., 1987) models was discussed.
The time course of auditory looming cues in redirecting visuo-spatial attention.
Glatz C, Chuang L Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):743.
PMID: 30679468 PMC: 6345893. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36033-8.
Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.
Yamaoka K, Michimata C Cogn Process. 2015; 16(4):417-25.
PMID: 26289477 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-015-0734-5.
Kliegl R, Wei P, Dambacher M, Yan M, Zhou X Front Psychol. 2011; 1:238.
PMID: 21833292 PMC: 3153842. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238.
Mechanisms of attention: Psychophysics, cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.
Lu Z Jpn J Psychon Sci. 2010; 27(1):38-45.
PMID: 20523762 PMC: 2879667.
Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be.
Makovski T, Jiang Y Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010; 63(2):216-25.
PMID: 20094943 PMC: 2811535. DOI: 10.1080/17470210903281590.