» Articles » PMID: 18262730

Hybrid IMRT for Treatment of Cancers of the Lung and Esophagus

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2008 Feb 12
PMID 18262730
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To report on a hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT; static plus IMRT beams treated concurrently) technique for lung and esophageal patients to reduce the volume of lung treated to low doses while delivering a conformal dose distribution.

Methods: Treatment plans were analyzed for 18 patients (12 lung and 6 esophageal). Patients were treated with a hybrid technique that concurrently combines static (approximately two-thirds dose) and IMRT (approximately one-third dose) beams. These plans were compared with conventional three-dimensional (3D; non-IMRT) plans and all IMRT plans using custom four- and five-field arrangements and nine equally spaced coplanar beams. Plans were optimized to reduce V13 and V5 values. Dose-volume histograms were calculated for the planning target volume, heart, and the ipsilateral, contralateral, and total lung. Lung volumes V5, V13, V20, V30; mean lung dose (MLD); and the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) were calculated for each plan.

Results: Hybrid plans treated significantly smaller total and contralateral lung volumes with low doses than nine-field IMRT plans. Largest reductions were for contralateral lung V5, V13, and V20 values for lung (-11%, -15%, -7%) and esophageal (-16%, -20%, -7%) patients. Smaller reductions were found also for 3D and four- and five-field IMRT plans. MLD and gEUDs were similar for all plan types. The 3D plans treated much larger extra planning target volumes to prescribed dose levels.

Conclusions: Hybrid IMRT demonstrated advantages for reduction of low-dose lung volumes in the thorax for reducing low dose to lung while also reducing the potential magnitude of dose deviations due to intrafraction motion and small field calculation accuracy.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Organ-at-risk Sparing in Esophageal Cancer: A Comparative Dosimetric Evaluation of Hybrid, Noncoplanar, and Coplanar RapidArc Plans.

Zope M, Patil D, Saroj D J Med Phys. 2024; 49(3):419-426.

PMID: 39526163 PMC: 11548063. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_63_24.


Voxel-S-Value based 3D treatment planning methods for Y-90 microspheres radioembolization based on Tc-99m-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT.

Chen G, Lu Z, Jiang H, Lin K, Mok G Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4020.

PMID: 36899031 PMC: 10006243. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30824-4.


The use of Hybrid Techniques in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Karaca S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 21:15330338221143937.

PMID: 36537067 PMC: 9772967. DOI: 10.1177/15330338221143937.


A novel CRT-IMRT-combined (Co-CRIM) planning technique for peripheral lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in pinnacle treatment planning system.

Duan Y, Zhou L, Wang H, Chen H, Gu H, Shao Y J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(12):97-107.

PMID: 34699670 PMC: 8664147. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13461.


Modified VMAT Plans for Locally Advanced Centrally Located Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Cheung E, Kwong V, Chan F, Cheng D, Cheng J, Yung S Life (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34685456 PMC: 8538695. DOI: 10.3390/life11101085.