Universal Survival Curve and Single Fraction Equivalent Dose: Useful Tools in Understanding Potency of Ablative Radiotherapy
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Overprediction of the potency and toxicity of high-dose ablative radiotherapy such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) by the linear quadratic (LQ) model led to many clinicians' hesitating to adopt this efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic option. The aim of this study was to offer an alternative method of analyzing the effect of SBRT by constructing a universal survival curve (USC) that provides superior approximation of the experimentally measured survival curves in the ablative, high-dose range without losing the strengths of the LQ model around the shoulder.
Methods And Materials: The USC was constructed by hybridizing two classic radiobiologic models: the LQ model and the multitarget model. We have assumed that the LQ model gives a good description for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for the dose to the shoulder. For ablative doses beyond the shoulder, the survival curve is better described as a straight line as predicted by the multitarget model. The USC smoothly interpolates from a parabola predicted by the LQ model to the terminal asymptote of the multitarget model in the high-dose region. From the USC, we derived two equivalence functions, the biologically effective dose and the single fraction equivalent dose for both CFRT and SBRT.
Results: The validity of the USC was tested by using previously published parameters of the LQ and multitarget models for non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines. A comparison of the goodness-of-fit of the LQ and USC models was made to a high-dose survival curve of the H460 non-small-cell lung cancer cell line.
Conclusion: The USC can be used to compare the dose fractionation schemes of both CFRT and SBRT. The USC provides an empirically and a clinically well-justified rationale for SBRT while preserving the strengths of the LQ model for CFRT.
FCB-CHOPS: An Evolution of a Commonly Used Acronym for Evaluating Radiation Treatment Plans.
Weisman M, McClelland 3rd S, Agrawal N, Jimenez R, Yechieli R, Fields E Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025; 10(1):101627.
PMID: 40017913 PMC: 11867132. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101627.
Ciurlia E, Santo B, Barba M, Cavalera E, De Franco P, De Matteis S Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1525926.
PMID: 39896186 PMC: 11782232. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1525926.
Luo W, Clair W Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).
PMID: 39684602 PMC: 11641765. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312891.
Cui M, Li Y, Liu J, Sun D J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(6):776-786.
PMID: 39468713 PMC: 11630060. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae077.
Particle Beam Radiobiology Status and Challenges: A PTCOG Radiobiology Subcommittee Report.
Ahmad R, Barcellini A, Baumann K, Benje M, Bender T, Bragado P Int J Part Ther. 2024; 13:100626.
PMID: 39258166 PMC: 11386331. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100626.