» Articles » PMID: 18257022

Assessment of Atrial Electromechanical Coupling and Influential Factors in Nonrheumatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal Clin Cardiol
Date 2008 Feb 8
PMID 18257022
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sequential analysis of atrial electromechanical coupling (P-A) by Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) might provide important insight into the mechanisms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate P-A and the dispersion of P-A, and to analyze the influential factors of P-A.

Methods: One hundred and ten patients with PAF and 87 normal controls were enrolled. Using DTI, the time intervals from the beginning of P-wave to the onset of atrioventricular ring motion related to atrial contraction were measured.

Results: Atrial electromechanical coupling at the interventricular septum atrioventricular annulus (P-A1), left lateral mitral annulus (P-A2) and right lateral tricuspid annulus (P-A3) in PAF group were significantly longer than those in control (p < 0.001). The difference between P-A2 and P-A1 (T1), P-A2 and P-A3 (T3) in PAF group were greater than those in control before age correction (p < 0.05). The linear regression analysis showed that the duration of PAF episodes and age were the greatest influential factors of P-A1 (r = 0.564). Left atrial anterior-posterior dimension (LAD) and age were the greatest influential factors of P-A2 (r = 0.459). The LAD was the greatest influential factors of T1 and T3 (r = 0.408, 0.542).

Conclusions: The atrial electromechanical coupling was significantly longer and the dispersion of P-A at left lateral mitral annulus was greater in PAF patients. The prolongation of P-A may be related to left atrial enlargement, long episodes of PAF and aging and the dispersion of P-A at left lateral mitral annulus to LAD.

Citing Articles

Atrial electromechanical delay in post-COVID-19 postural orthostatic tachycardia: Innocent bystander or pathologic factor.

Zein ELAbdeen S, El-Dosouky I, Elshabrawy A, Mohammed El Maghawry L Indian Heart J. 2023; 75(4):292-297.

PMID: 37321349 PMC: 10263230. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.06.001.


Assessment of atrial conduction times in patients with frequent premature ventricular complex.

Kahraman E, Keles N, Parsova K, Bastopcu M, Karatas M J Arrhythm. 2023; 39(1):34-41.

PMID: 36733324 PMC: 9885309. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12806.


Coexistence of fibromyalgia syndrome and inflammatory rheumatic diseases, and autonomic cardiovascular system involvement in fibromyalgia syndrome.

Kocyigit B, Akyol A Clin Rheumatol. 2022; 42(3):645-652.

PMID: 36151442 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06385-8.


Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Triggers Atrial Conduction Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Moysidis D, Papazoglou A, Tsagkaris C, Oikonomou V, Loudovikou A, Kartas A Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022; 12(7):802-813.

PMID: 35877459 PMC: 9323031. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe12070059.


Prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension: A comprehensive comparison of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Huang P, Huang C, Lin S, Chen J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022; 24(7):838-847.

PMID: 35695288 PMC: 9278568. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14524.


References
1.
Fukunami M, Yamada T, Ohmori M, Kumagai K, Umemoto K, Sakai A . Detection of patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1991; 83(1):162-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.162. View

2.
Barbier P, Alioto G, Guazzi M . Left atrial function and ventricular filling in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24(1):165-70. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90558-4. View

3.
Hashiba K, Tanigawa M, Fukatani M, Shimizu A, Konoe A, Kadena M . Electrophysiologic properties of atrial muscle in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64(20):20J-23J. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)91192-2. View

4.
Daubert J, Pavin D, Jauvert G, Mabo P . Intra- and interatrial conduction delay: implications for cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27(4):507-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00473.x. View

5.
Nii M, Shimizu M, Roman K, Konstantinov I, Li J, Redington A . Doppler tissue imaging in the assessment of atrioventricular conduction time: validation of a novel technique and comparison with electrophysiologic and pulsed wave Doppler-derived equivalents in an animal model. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006; 19(3):314-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.09.010. View