Effectiveness of Exercise-referral Schemes to Promote Physical Activity in Adults: Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2008 Feb 7

PMID 18252074

Citations 111

Authors

Nefyn H Williams

Maggie Hendry

Barbara France

Ruth Lewis

Clare Wilkinson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the health benefits of physical activity, most adults do not take the recommended amount of exercise.

Aim: To assess whether exercise-referral schemes are effective in improving exercise participation in sedentary adults.

Design Of Study: Systematic review.

Method: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library and SIGLE until March 2007. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, process evaluations and qualitative studies of exercise-referral schemes, defined as referral by a primary care clinician to a programme that encouraged physical activity or exercise were included. RCT results were combined in a meta-analysis where there was sufficient homogeneity.

Results: Eighteen studies were included in the review. These comprised six RCTs, one non-randomised controlled study, four observational studies, six process evaluations and one qualitative study. In addition, two of the RCTs and two of the process evaluations incorporated a qualitative component. Results from five RCTs were combined in a meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant increase in the numbers of participants doing moderate exercise with a combined relative risk of 1.20 (95% confidence intervals = 1.06 to 1.35). This means that 17 sedentary adults would need to be referred for one to become moderately active. This small effect may be at least partly due to poor rates of uptake and adherence to the exercise schemes.

Conclusion: Exercise-referral schemes have a small effect on increasing physical activity in sedentary people. The key challenge, if future exercise-referral schemes are to be commissioned by the NHS, is to increase uptake and improve adherence by addressing the barriers described in these studies.

Citing Articles

Adaptations to the welsh national exercise referral scheme during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of service users and providers and supplementary out-of-pocket cost analysis.

Newby K, Howlett N, Wagner A, Lloyd N, Freethy I, Bontoft C BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):406.

PMID: 39891134 PMC: 11786398. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21502-3.

Influencing basic behavioral mechanisms of action while targeting daily walking in sedentary adults at risk for cardiovascular disease: randomised factorial design protocol.

Goodwin A, Gordon S, Sahni R, Vicari F, Accardi K, Crusco S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e080307.

PMID: 39755564 PMC: 11749394. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080307.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile-Assisted Screening and Brief Intervention for Multiple Health Behaviors in Medical Settings.

Forcier C, Constant A, Grisard F, Clair E, Val-Laillet D, Thibault R J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15:21501319241303604.

PMID: 39707878 PMC: 11663265. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241303604.

Referral pathway and competency profiles of primary care physiotherapists and kinesiologists for physical activity interventions for diabetes: a modified Delphi study.

Proctor C, Brown C BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):368.

PMID: 39407129 PMC: 11479570. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02611-1.

A Nationwide Physical Activity Intervention for 654,500 Adults in Singapore: Cost-Utility Analysis.

Ang G, Tan C, Teerawattananon Y, Muller-Riemenschneider F, Chen C JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10():e46178.

PMID: 39365682 PMC: 11468974. DOI: 10.2196/46178.

References

Day F, Nettleton B . The Scottish Borders general practitioners exercise referral scheme (GPERS). Health Bull (Edinb). 2003; 59(5):343-6. View

Deeks J, Dinnes J, DAmico R, Sowden A, Sakarovitch C, Song F . Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7(27):iii-x, 1-173. DOI: 10.3310/hta7270. View

Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G . Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1999; 8(3):341-51. DOI: 10.1177/104973239800800305. View

Morgan O . Approaches to increase physical activity: reviewing the evidence for exercise-referral schemes. Public Health. 2005; 119(5):361-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.008. View

Dinan S, Lenihan P, Tenn T, Iliffe S . Is the promotion of physical activity in vulnerable older people feasible and effective in general practice?. Br J Gen Pract. 2006; 56(531):791-3. PMC: 1920721. View

Fritz T, Wandell P, Aberg H, Engfeldt P . Walking for exercise--does three times per week influence risk factors in type 2 diabetes?. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 71(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.06.002. View

Harrison R, Roberts C, Elton P . Does primary care referral to an exercise programme increase physical activity one year later? A randomized controlled trial. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004; 27(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh197. View

Munro J, Nicholl J, Brazier J, Davey R, Cochrane T . Cost effectiveness of a community based exercise programme in over 65 year olds: cluster randomised trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58(12):1004-10. PMC: 1732655. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.014225. View

Taylor A, Fox K . Effectiveness of a primary care exercise referral intervention for changing physical self-perceptions over 9 months. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.11. View

10.

Taylor A, Doust J, Webborn N . Randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a GP exercise referral programme in Hailsham, East Sussex, on modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 52(9):595-601. PMC: 1756762. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.9.595. View

11.

Damush T, Stump T, Saporito A, Clark D . Predictors of older primary care patients' participation in a submaximal exercise test and a supervised, low-impact exercise class. Prev Med. 2001; 33(5):485-94. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0919. View

12.

Isaacs A, Critchley J, See Tai S, Buckingham K, Westley D, Harridge S . Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(10):1-165, iii-iv. DOI: 10.3310/hta11100. View

13.

Marshall S, Biddle S . The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 23(4):229-46. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_2. View

14.

Downs S, Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6):377-84. PMC: 1756728. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377. View

15.

Lamb S, Bartlett H, Ashley A, Bird W . Can lay-led walking programmes increase physical activity in middle aged adults? A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(4):246-52. PMC: 1732126. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.4.246. View

16.

Stevens W, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, McArdle D . Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45-74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 1998; 32(3):236-41. PMC: 1756094. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.32.3.236. View

17.

Dugdill L, Graham R, McNair F . Exercise referral: the public health panacea for physical activity promotion? A critical perspective of exercise referral schemes; their development and evaluation. Ergonomics. 2005; 48(11-14):1390-410. DOI: 10.1080/00140130500101544. View