Israeli T, Samara N, Barda S, Groutz A, Azem F, Amir H
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025; 29(1):136-144.
PMID: 39835796
PMC: 11867238.
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240099.
Kirshenbaum M, Gil O, Haas J, Nahum R, Zilberberg E, Lebovitz O
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):182.
PMID: 34886872
PMC: 8655989.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00853-7.
Buhler K, Fischer R, Verpillat P, Allignol A, Guedes S, Boutmy E
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):90.
PMID: 34134695
PMC: 8207759.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00768-3.
Chua S, Mol B, Longobardi S, Orvieto R, Venetis C, Lispi M
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19(1):51.
PMID: 33794909
PMC: 8017804.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00727-y.
Cui L, Lin Y, Wang F, Chen C
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 303(3):615-630.
PMID: 33433705
PMC: 7960625.
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05939-y.
The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders.
Luo Y, Sun L, Dong M, Zhang X, Huang L, Zhu X
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):102.
PMID: 33059712
PMC: 7566062.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00655-3.
Influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation: an overview.
Smitz J, Platteau P
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):80.
PMID: 32762698
PMC: 7409634.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00639-3.
Gonadotropin versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for Ovarian Response in Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.
Ji Z, Quan X, Lan Y, Zhao M, Tian X, Yang X
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 92:100572.
PMID: 31908689
PMC: 6940711.
DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.100572.
Efficacy of follitropin-alpha versus human menopausal gonadotropin for male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
Ortac M, Hidir M, Cilesiz N, Kadioglu A
Turk J Urol. 2020; 46(1):13-17.
PMID: 31905120
PMC: 6944427.
DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.19177.
The ratio of exogenous Luteinizing hormone to Follicle stimulating hormone administered for controlled ovarian stimulation is associated with oocytes' number and competence.
Albu D, Albu A
Biosci Rep. 2019; 40(1).
PMID: 31850491
PMC: 6944660.
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190811.
Urinary Versus Recombinant Gonadotropins for Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Patki A, Bavishi H, Kumari C, Kamraj J, Venugopal M, Kunjimoideen K
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018; 11(2):119-124.
PMID: 30158806
PMC: 6094533.
DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_79_17.
The effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin contained in human menopausal gonadotropin on the clinical outcomes during progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.
Zhu X, Ye J, Fu Y, Ai A, Cai R, Wang Y
Oncotarget. 2017; 8(50):87340-87352.
PMID: 29152085
PMC: 5675637.
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20508.
Treatment Outcome of Ovulation-inducing Agents in Patients with Anovulatory Infertility: A Prospective, Observational Study.
Prajapati K, Desai M, Shah S, Choudhary S, Aggarwal R, Mishra V
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017; 8(3):116-121.
PMID: 29081619
PMC: 5642124.
DOI: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_43_17.
Evaluation of Progesterone and Ovulation-stimulating Drugs on the Glandular Epithelium and Angiogenesis in Mice.
Rashidi B, Mardani M, Peyvandi Karizbodagh M
Adv Biomed Res. 2017; 6:116.
PMID: 28989909
PMC: 5627566.
DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_179_16.
A Comparison of Outcomes from Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist....
Bleau N, Agdi M, Son W, Tan S, Dahan M
Int J Fertil Steril. 2017; 11(2):79-84.
PMID: 28670424
PMC: 5347454.
DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4759.
The Effect of Four Different Gonadotropin Protocols on Oocyte and Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles; A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Parsanezhad M, Jahromi B, Rezaee S, Kooshesh L, Alaee S
Iran J Med Sci. 2017; 42(1):57-65.
PMID: 28293051
PMC: 5337766.
Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population.
Revelli A, Pettinau G, Basso G, Carosso A, Ferrero A, Dallan C
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015; 13:77.
PMID: 26209525
PMC: 4514947.
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0080-6.
Comparison of FSH and hMG on ovarian stimulation outcome with a GnRH antagonist protocol in younger and advanced reproductive age women.
Tabata C, Fujiwara T, Sugawa M, Noma M, Onoue H, Kusumi M
Reprod Med Biol. 2015; 14:5-9.
PMID: 25620883
PMC: 4300428.
DOI: 10.1007/s12522-014-0186-0.
Human Menopausal Gonadotropin versus Recombinant FSH in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.
Turkcapar A, Seckin B, Onalan G, Ozdener T, Batioglu S
Int J Fertil Steril. 2014; 6(4):238-43.
PMID: 24520446
PMC: 3850313.
Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.
Requena A, Cruz M, Ruiz F, Garcia-Velasco J
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12:10.
PMID: 24476504
PMC: 3907361.
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-10.