» Articles » PMID: 18245326

The Contribution of Social Effects to Heritable Variation in Finishing Traits of Domestic Pigs (Sus Scrofa)

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Feb 5
PMID 18245326
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social interactions among individuals are ubiquitous both in animals and in plants, and in natural as well as domestic populations. These interactions affect both the direction and the magnitude of responses to selection and are a key factor in evolutionary success of species and in the design of breeding schemes in agriculture. At present, however, very little is known of the contribution of social effects to heritable variance in trait values. Here we present estimates of the direct and social genetic variance in growth rate, feed intake, back fat thickness, and muscle depth in a population of 14,032 domestic pigs with known pedigree. Results show that social effects contribute the vast majority of heritable variance in growth rate and feed intake in this population. Total heritable variance expressed relative to phenotypic variance was 71% for growth rate and 70% for feed intake. These values clearly exceed the usual range of heritability for those traits. Back fat thickness and muscle depth showed no heritable variance due to social effects. Our results suggest that genetic improvement in agriculture can be substantially advanced by redirecting breeding schemes, so as to capture heritable variance due to social effects.

Citing Articles

Indirect genetic effects increase the heritable variation available to selection and are largest for behaviors: a meta-analysis.

Santostefano F, Moiron M, Sanchez-Tojar A, Fisher D Evol Lett. 2025; 9(1):89-104.

PMID: 39906585 PMC: 11790215. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrae051.


Comparison of linear mixed models for genetic feather score analysis in laying hens kept in recurrent testing facilities.

Osorio-Gallardo T, Bijma P Poult Sci. 2025; 104(2):104833.

PMID: 39879719 PMC: 11810823. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104833.


Indirect genetic effects are shaped by demographic history and ecology in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Montazeaud G, Helleu Q, Wuest S, Keller L Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(11):1878-1891.

PMID: 37749402 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02189-4.


Incorporating the pedigree information in multi-environment trial analyses for improving common vetch.

Munoz Santa I, Nagel S, Taylor J Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1166133.

PMID: 37655219 PMC: 10467272. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1166133.


Using social interaction models for genetic analysis of skin damage in gilts.

Leite N, Knol E, Tsuruta S, Nuphaus S, Vogelzang R, Lourenco D Genet Sel Evol. 2023; 55(1):52.

PMID: 37488486 PMC: 10364388. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00816-z.


References
1.
Henderson C . Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975; 31(2):423-47. View

2.
Craig J, Muir W . Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: beak-related mortality, feathering, and body weight responses. Poult Sci. 1996; 75(3):294-302. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0750294. View

3.
Lehmann L, Keller L, West S, Roze D . Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(16):6736-9. PMC: 1871855. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700662104. View

4.
Sorensen D, Kennedy B . Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. J Anim Sci. 1986; 63(1):245-58. DOI: 10.2527/jas1986.631245x. View

5.
Bijma P, Muir W, Ellen E, Wolf J, van Arendonk J . Multilevel selection 2: Estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics. 2006; 175(1):289-99. PMC: 1775010. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.062729. View