» Articles » PMID: 18241050

Differential Output of the High-sensitivity Rod Photoreceptor: AII Amacrine Pathway

Overview
Journal J Comp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Feb 5
PMID 18241050
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the mammalian retina, the scotopic threshold of ganglion cells is in part dependent on how rod inputs are summed by their presynaptic cone bipolar cells. For ON cone bipolar cells, there are two anatomical routes for rod signals: 1) cone photoreceptors receive inputs via gap junctions with the surrounding, more numerous rods; and 2) ON cone bipolar cells receive highly convergent input via gap junctions with AII amacrine cells, which each receive input from hundreds of rods. Rod-cone coupling is thought to be utilized at higher photon fluxes relative to the AII-ON cone bipolar pathway due to the impedance mismatch of a single small rod driving a larger cone. Furthermore, it is widely held that the convergence of high-gain chemical synapses onto AIIs confers the highest sensitivity to ON cone bipolar cells and ganglion cells. A lack of coupling between one or more types of ON cone bipolar cells and AIIs would obviate this high-sensitivity pathway and explain the existence of ganglion cells with elevated scotopic thresholds. To investigate this possibility, we examined Neurobiotin and glycine diffusion from AIIs to bipolar cells and found that approximately one-fifth of ON cone bipolar cells are not coupled to AIIs. Unlike AII-AII coupling, which changes with ambient background intensity, the fraction of noncoupled ON cone bipolar cells was unaltered by dark or light adaptation. These data suggest that one of five morphologically distinct ON cone bipolar cell types is not coupled to AIIs and suggest that AII-ON cone bipolar coupling is modulated differently from AII-AII coupling.

Citing Articles

Rod and Cone Connections With Bipolar Cells in the Rabbit Retina.

Whitaker C, Nobles G, Ishibashi M, Massey S Front Cell Neurosci. 2021; 15:662329.

PMID: 34025360 PMC: 8134685. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.662329.


Modeling Circadian Phototransduction: Retinal Neurophysiology and Neuroanatomy.

Rea M, Nagare R, Figueiro M Front Neurosci. 2021; 14:615305.

PMID: 33613175 PMC: 7892603. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.615305.


Network Architecture of Gap Junctional Coupling among Parallel Processing Channels in the Mammalian Retina.

Sigulinsky C, Anderson J, Kerzner E, Rapp C, Pfeiffer R, Rodman T J Neurosci. 2020; 40(23):4483-4511.

PMID: 32332119 PMC: 7275861. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1810-19.2020.


Heterocellular Coupling Between Amacrine Cells and Ganglion Cells.

Marc R, Sigulinsky C, Pfeiffer R, Emrich D, Anderson J, Jones B Front Neural Circuits. 2018; 12:90.

PMID: 30487737 PMC: 6247779. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00090.


Classification of Mouse Retinal Bipolar Cells: Type-Specific Connectivity with Special Reference to Rod-Driven AII Amacrine Pathways.

Tsukamoto Y, Omi N Front Neuroanat. 2017; 11:92.

PMID: 29114208 PMC: 5660706. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00092.


References
1.
Strettoi E, Dacheux R, Raviola E . Cone bipolar cells as interneurons in the rod pathway of the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol. 1994; 347(1):139-49. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903470111. View

2.
McGuire B, Stevens J, Sterling P . Microcircuitry of bipolar cells in cat retina. J Neurosci. 1984; 4(12):2920-38. PMC: 6564860. View

3.
McGillem G, Dacheux R . Rabbit cone bipolar cells: correlation of their morphologies with whole-cell recordings. Vis Neurosci. 2002; 18(5):675-85. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801185019. View

4.
Kolb H, Marshak D . The midget pathways of the primate retina. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003; 106(1):67-81. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022469002511. View

5.
Massey S, Mills S . Gap junctions between AII amacrine cells and calbindin-positive bipolar cells in the rabbit retina. Vis Neurosci. 1999; 16(6):1181-9. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523899166173. View