Acute Bacterial Prostatitis: Heterogeneity in Diagnostic Criteria and Management. Retrospective Multicentric Analysis of 371 Patients Diagnosed with Acute Prostatitis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: There is currently a lack of consensus for the diagnosis, investigations and treatments of acute bacterial prostatitis (AP).
Methods: The symptoms, investigations and treatments of 371 inpatients diagnosed with AP were analyzed through a retrospective study conducted in four departments - Urology (U), Infectious Diseases (ID), Internal Medicine (IM), Geriatrics (G) - of two French university hospitals.
Results: The cause of admission, symptoms, investigations and treatments depended markedly on the department of admission but not on the hospital. In U, patients commonly presented with a bladder outlet obstruction, they had a large imaging and functional check-up, and received alpha-blockers and anti-inflammatory drugs. In ID, patients were febrile and received longer and more appropriate antibiotic treatments. In G, patients presented with cognitive disorders and commonly had post-void urine volume measurements. In IM, patients presented with a wide range of symptoms, and had very diverse investigations and antibiotic regimen.Overall, a 3:1 ratio of community-acquired AP (CA-AP) to nosocomial AP (N-AP) was observed. Urine culture isolated mainly E. coli (58% of AP, 68% of CA-AP), with venereal agents constituting less than 1%. The probabilistic antibiotic treatments were similar for N-AP and CA-AP (58% bi-therapy; 63% fluoroquinolone-based regimen). For N-AP, these treatments were more likely to be inadequate (42% vs. 8%, p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of bacteriological failure (48% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Clinical failure at follow-up was more common than bacteriological failure (75% versus 24%, p < 0.001). Patients older than 49 had more underlying urinary tract disorders and a higher rate of clinical failure (30% versus 10%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: This study highlights the difficulties encountered on a daily basis by the physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of acute prostatitis.
Acute Bacterial Prostatitis in a 12-Year-Old Boy Without Any Underlying Disease.
Kinoshita K, Suzuki M, Koketsu M, Fukasawa T, Kubota T Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60900.
PMID: 38910716 PMC: 11193146. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60900.
Han S, Chen X, Li Z Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).
PMID: 36765715 PMC: 9913549. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030757.
Banza M, Kasanga T, Mukakala A, Ndwala Y, Ngoie C, Cabala V Pan Afr Med J. 2021; 37:290.
PMID: 33654514 PMC: 7881926. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.290.21260.
Arjunlal T, Deepanjali S, Manikandan R, Medha R F1000Res. 2020; 9:617.
PMID: 33274047 PMC: 7684675. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24094.3.
Pharmacological Interventions for Bacterial Prostatitis.
Xiong S, Liu X, Deng W, Zhou Z, Li Y, Tu Y Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:504.
PMID: 32425775 PMC: 7203426. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00504.