» Articles » PMID: 18229474

Working Memory and the Attentional Blink: Blink Size is Predicted by Individual Differences in Operation Span

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2008 Jan 31
PMID 18229474
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) is often attributed to resource limitations, but the nature of these resources is commonly underspecified. Recent observations rule out access to short-term memory or storage capacity as limiting factors, but operation bottlenecks are still an option. We considered the operation span of working memory (WM) as a possible factor and investigated the relationship between individual WM operation span (as measured by OSPAN), fluid intelligence (as measures by Raven's SPM), and the size of the AB. WM operation span was negatively correlated with the AB, whereas fluid intelligence was associated with higher overall accuracy but not with AB magnitude. These results support the idea that individual processing limitations (with regard to either attentional allocation policies or the speed of global cortical integration processes) play a key role in the AB.

Citing Articles

Action Real-Time Strategy Gaming Experience Related to Increased Attentional Resources: An Attentional Blink Study.

Gan X, Yao Y, Liu H, Zong X, Cui R, Qiu N Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:101.

PMID: 32341688 PMC: 7163005. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00101.


Temporal predictability does not impact attentional blink performance: effects of fixed vs. random inter-trial intervals.

Shenfield L, Beanland V, Apthorp D PeerJ. 2020; 8:e8677.

PMID: 32185105 PMC: 7060903. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8677.


No Evidence for an Auditory Attentional Blink for Voices Regardless of Musical Expertise.

Akca M, Laeng B, Godoy R Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2935.

PMID: 31998190 PMC: 6966238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02935.


Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect.

Schmitz F, Rotter D, Wilhelm O J Intell. 2019; 6(4).

PMID: 31162474 PMC: 6480757. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence6040047.


Specific differences in temporal binding aspects of the attentional blink in Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Kopec J, Russo N, Antshel K, Fremont W, Kates W Cortex. 2018; 108:67-79.

PMID: 30130634 PMC: 7730721. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.014.


References
1.
Potter M . Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1976; 2(5):509-22. View

2.
Kessler K, Schmitz F, Gross J, Hommel B, Shapiro K, Schnitzler A . Target consolidation under high temporal processing demands as revealed by MEG. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(4):1030-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.020. View

3.
Vogel E, Luck S, Shapiro K . Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998; 24(6):1656-74. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1656. View

4.
Hommel B, Kessler K, Schmitz F, Gross J, Akyurek E, Shapiro K . How the brain blinks: towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink. Psychol Res. 2005; 70(6):425-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0009-3. View

5.
Hommel B, Akyurek E . Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58(8):1415-33. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000647. View