» Articles » PMID: 18226210

Assortative Mating and Fragmentation Within Dog Breeds

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Jan 30
PMID 18226210
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are around 400 internationally recognized dog breeds in the world today, with a remarkable diversity in size, shape, color and behavior. Breeds are considered to be uniform groups with similar physical characteristics, shaped by selection rooted in human preferences. This has led to a large genetic difference between breeds and a large extent of linkage disequilibrium within breeds. These characteristics are important for association mapping of candidate genes for diseases and therefore make dogs ideal models for gene mapping of human disorders. However, genetic uniformity within breeds may not always be the case. We studied patterns of genetic diversity within 164 poodles and compared it to 133 dogs from eight other breeds.

Results: Our analyses revealed strong population structure within poodles, with differences among some poodle groups as pronounced as those among other well-recognized breeds. Pedigree analysis going three generations back in time confirmed that subgroups within poodles result from assortative mating imposed by breed standards as well as breeder preferences. Matings have not taken place at random or within traditionally identified size classes in poodles. Instead, a novel set of five poodle groups was identified, defined by combinations of size and color, which is not officially recognized by the kennel clubs. Patterns of genetic diversity in other breeds suggest that assortative mating leading to fragmentation may be a common feature within many dog breeds.

Conclusion: The genetic structure observed in poodles is the result of local mating patterns, implying that breed fragmentation may be different in different countries. Such pronounced structuring within dog breeds can increase the power of association mapping studies, but also represents a serious problem if ignored. In dog breeding, individuals are selected on the basis of morphology, behaviour, working or show purposes, as well as geographic population structure. The same processes which have historically created dog breeds are still ongoing, and create further subdivision within current dog breeds.

Citing Articles

Population Genetic Investigation of in the Yangtze River Basin Based on RAD Sequencing Data.

Li W, Yu J, Que Y, Hu X, Wang E, Liao X Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39452145 PMC: 11504563. DOI: 10.3390/biology13100837.


Epithelial barrier dysfunction and associated diseases in companion animals: Differences and similarities between humans and animals and research needs.

Ardicli S, Ardicli O, Yazici D, Pat Y, Babayev H, Xiong P Allergy. 2024; 79(12):3238-3268.

PMID: 39417247 PMC: 11657079. DOI: 10.1111/all.16343.


Genetic variations and dog breed identification using inter-simple sequence repeat markers coupled with high resolution melting analysis.

Kriangwanich W, Nganvongpanit K, Buddhachat K, Siengdee P, Chomdej S, Ponsuksili S PeerJ. 2020; 8:e10215.

PMID: 33194413 PMC: 7605226. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10215.


Analysis of Genetic Diversity in the Czech Spotted Dog.

Machova K, Kranjcevicova A, Vostry L, Krupa E Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(8).

PMID: 32823819 PMC: 7459660. DOI: 10.3390/ani10081416.


Genomic data illuminates demography, genetic structure and selection of a popular dog breed.

Wiener P, Sanchez-Molano E, Clements D, Woolliams J, Haskell M, Blott S BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):609.

PMID: 28806925 PMC: 5557481. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3933-x.


References
1.
Zajc I, Sampson J . Utility of canine microsatellites in revealing the relationships of pure bred dogs. J Hered. 1999; 90(1):104-7. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/90.1.104. View

2.
Jouquand S, Priat C, Hitte C, Lachaume P, Andre C, Galibert F . Identification and characterization of a set of 100 tri- and dinucleotide microsatellites in the canine genome. Anim Genet. 2000; 31(4):266-72. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00642.x. View

3.
Nei M . Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978; 89(3):583-90. PMC: 1213855. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. View

4.
Ostrander E, Wayne R . The canine genome. Genome Res. 2005; 15(12):1706-16. DOI: 10.1101/gr.3736605. View

5.
Irion D, Schaffer A, Grant S, Wilton A, Pedersen N . Genetic variation analysis of the Bali street dog using microsatellites. BMC Genet. 2005; 6:6. PMC: 549630. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-6. View