[Biomechanical Comparison of Self-drilling and Self-tapping Orthodontic Micro-implants]
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical influences of self-drilling and self-tapping methods on orthodontic micro-implants under immediate loading.
Methods: Fifty-six micro-implants placed at the interradicular areas of buccal side of upper and lower jaws in two dogs were divided into self-drilling and self-tapping groups. A horizontal load of 1.96 N was immediately given for 9 weeks. Peak insertion torque and peak removal torque were tested immediately after implantation and after the dogs were killed, respectively.
Results: Both in the upper and lower jaws peak insertion torque was significantly higher in self-drilling group [(5.6 +/- 1.1) N.cm and (8.7 +/- 2.3) N.cm] than in self-tapping group [(3.5 +/- 2.1) N.cm and (7.4 +/- 1.1) N.cm] (P < 0.05). Both in the upper and lower jaws peak removal torque was higher in self-drilling group [(-6.5 +/- 2.2) N.cm and (-7.1 +/- 2.0) N.cm] than in self-tapping group [(-5.7 +/- 2.3) N.cm and (-6.1 +/- 0.5) N.cm]. No significant difference was found (P > 0.05). The tendency of fracture was found in self-drilling group.
Conclusions: Self-drilling micro-implants have high initial stability and can be used in the maxilla and at thin cortical bone area of mandible.
Pareek P, Kumar A, Bhariya B, Bamal R, Yadav L, Jaswal A Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54283.
PMID: 38496186 PMC: 10944568. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54283.
Accuracy of Microimplant Placement Using a 3D Guide Plate for Orthodontic Anchorage.
Zhu F, Ji L, Zhou C, Cao Y, Chen Z, Wu X Appl Bionics Biomech. 2023; 2023:9060046.
PMID: 37404956 PMC: 10317578. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9060046.
Popa A, Dehelean C, Calniceanu H, Watz C, Brad S, Sinescu C Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(21).
PMID: 33120951 PMC: 7663474. DOI: 10.3390/ma13214789.