I-TASSER Server for Protein 3D Structure Prediction

Overview

Journal BMC Bioinformatics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2008 Jan 25

PMID 18215316

Citations 2391

Authors

Yang Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Prediction of 3-dimensional protein structures from amino acid sequences represents one of the most important problems in computational structural biology. The community-wide Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) experiments have been designed to obtain an objective assessment of the state-of-the-art of the field, where I-TASSER was ranked as the best method in the server section of the recent 7th CASP experiment. Our laboratory has since then received numerous requests about the public availability of the I-TASSER algorithm and the usage of the I-TASSER predictions.

Results: An on-line version of I-TASSER is developed at the KU Center for Bioinformatics which has generated protein structure predictions for thousands of modeling requests from more than 35 countries. A scoring function (C-score) based on the relative clustering structural density and the consensus significance score of multiple threading templates is introduced to estimate the accuracy of the I-TASSER predictions. A large-scale benchmark test demonstrates a strong correlation between the C-score and the TM-score (a structural similarity measurement with values in [0, 1]) of the first models with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. Using a C-score cutoff > -1.5 for the models of correct topology, both false positive and false negative rates are below 0.1. Combining C-score and protein length, the accuracy of the I-TASSER models can be predicted with an average error of 0.08 for TM-score and 2 A for RMSD.

Conclusion: The I-TASSER server has been developed to generate automated full-length 3D protein structural predictions where the benchmarked scoring system helps users to obtain quantitative assessments of the I-TASSER models. The output of the I-TASSER server for each query includes up to five full-length models, the confidence score, the estimated TM-score and RMSD, and the standard deviation of the estimations. The I-TASSER server is freely available to the academic community at http://zhang.bioinformatics.ku.edu/I-TASSER.

Citing Articles

Identifying the potential mediators of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among TACR1 gene polymorphisms: a study on breast cancer patients.

Ghorbani M, Namazi S, Dehghani M, Razi F, Khalvati B, Dehshahri A Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 40080356 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07674-x.

TopoQA: a topological deep learning-based approach for protein complex structure interface quality assessment.

Han B, Zhang Y, Li L, Gong X, Xia K Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 40062613 PMC: 11891663. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf083.

Evaluation of various bioactive molecules for their gp120-CD4 binding inhibitory properties by in-silico molecular docking and dynamic studies.

Tank H, Deshmukh N In Silico Pharmacol. 2025; 13(1):38.

PMID: 40061633 PMC: 11885758. DOI: 10.1007/s40203-025-00327-3.

Screening the human druggable genome identifies ABHD17B as an anti-fibrotic target in hepatic stellate cells.

Li W, Sparks R, Sun C, Yang Y, Pantano L, Kirchner R Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2109.

PMID: 40025044 PMC: 11873113. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56900-z.

Identifying natural inhibitors against FUS protein in dementia through machine learning, molecular docking, and dynamics simulation.

Li D Front Neuroinform. 2025; 18:1439090.

PMID: 39975842 PMC: 11835945. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1439090.

References

Zhang Y, Skolnick J . Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(20):7594-9. PMC: 419651. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0305695101. View

Zhang Y . Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins. 2007; 69 Suppl 8:108-17. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21702. View

Battey J, Kopp J, Bordoli L, Read R, Clarke N, Schwede T . Automated server predictions in CASP7. Proteins. 2007; 69 Suppl 8:68-82. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21761. View

Skolnick J, Fetrow J, Kolinski A . Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(3):283-7. DOI: 10.1038/73723. View

Wallner B, Elofsson A . Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins. 2007; 69 Suppl 8:184-93. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21774. View

Berman H, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat T, Weissig H . The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(1):235-42. PMC: 102472. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. View

Murzin A, Bateman A . CASP2 knowledge-based approach to distant homology recognition and fold prediction in CASP4. Proteins. 2002; Suppl 5:76-85. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10037. View

Canutescu A, Shelenkov A, Dunbrack Jr R . A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 2003; 12(9):2001-14. PMC: 2323997. DOI: 10.1110/ps.03154503. View

NEEDLEMAN S, Wunsch C . A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970; 48(3):443-53. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4. View

10.

Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R . Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics. 1999; 14(10):846-56. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.10.846. View

11.

Fischer D . Servers for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006; 16(2):178-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.03.004. View

12.

Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J . Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins. 2002; 48(2):192-201. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10141. View

13.

Betancourt M, Skolnick J . Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures. Biopolymers. 2001; 59(5):305-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0282(20011015)59:5<305::AID-BIP1027>3.0.CO;2-6. View

14.

Baker D, Sali A . Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 2001; 294(5540):93-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1065659. View

15.

Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K . Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins. 1999; Suppl 3:22-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<22::aid-prot5>3.3.co;2-n. View

16.

Ginalski K, Rychlewski L . Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment. Proteins. 2003; 53 Suppl 6:410-7. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10548. View

17.

Wu S, Zhang Y . LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(10):3375-82. PMC: 1904280. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm251. View

18.

Wu S, Skolnick J, Zhang Y . Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol. 2007; 5:17. PMC: 1878469. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-17. View

19.

Tosatto S . The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J Comput Biol. 2005; 12(10):1316-27. DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.1316. View

20.

Zhang Y, Skolnick J . Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 2004; 57(4):702-10. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20264. View