» Articles » PMID: 18209997

[Relevance of Cell Culture Models in Cutaneous Tumour Biology: Part II: Complex Culture Systems]

Overview
Journal Hautarzt
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2008 Jan 23
PMID 18209997
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are several limitations to the use of the classical monolayer cell culture and the results obtained by means of it. The two-dimensional architecture and the analysis of pure cell populations of individual cell lines are the most several deviations from the situation prevailing in tissues in vivo, with inevitable consequences for the phenotypic traits displayed on the one hand, and for the genome structure and expression on the other hand. Newer developments in cell culture methodology seek approaches to mimic the in vivo situation in the cell culture as closely as possible. Remarkable variety of such approaches can be noticed, ranging from relative simple three-dimensional conditions of culturing pure cell lines on collagen gels or in form of multicell tumor spheroids. More complex forms try to combine multiple cell types in a single co-culture, e.g. of tumour cells and stromal fibroblasts. The most complex and most revealing among the three-dimensional culture arrangements is unquestionably the organotypic skin culture, in which all the relevant skin cell types are combined in a tissue-resembling construct, with resulting marked similarity to the anatomical structure of normal human skin. Several crucial results were obtained thereby, among others an intrinsic difference in the development of invasive squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma could be demonstrated. Just another experimental direction aims at direct tumourigenic transformation of normal human keratinocytes and melanocytes using highly efficient retroviral vectors. Immediately after establishing of the organotypic skin culture are such directly transformed primary cells transplanted on a nude mouse and the whole tumourigenic process is then essentially followed in vivo. This example illustrates finally the various possibilities of combination of in vitro and in vivo experimental approaches.

References
1.
Elenbaas B, Spirio L, Koerner F, Fleming M, Zimonjic D, Donaher J . Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells. Genes Dev. 2001; 15(1):50-65. PMC: 312602. DOI: 10.1101/gad.828901. View

2.
Monzani E, Facchetti F, Galmozzi E, Corsini E, Benetti A, Cavazzin C . Melanoma contains CD133 and ABCG2 positive cells with enhanced tumourigenic potential. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43(5):935-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.017. View

3.
Zhang W, Vaccariello M, Wang Y, Alt-Holland A, Fusenig N, Garlick J . Escape from microenvironmental control and progression of intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2005; 116(6):885-93. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21103. View

4.
Gallagher P, Bao Y, Prorock A, Zigrino P, Nischt R, Politi V . Gene expression profiling reveals cross-talk between melanoma and fibroblasts: implications for host-tumor interactions in metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(10):4134-46. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0415. View

5.
Haass N, Herlyn M . Normal human melanocyte homeostasis as a paradigm for understanding melanoma. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2005; 10(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1087-0024.2005.200407.x. View