» Articles » PMID: 18209148

Evaluation of a Preoperative Checklist and Team Briefing Among Surgeons, Nurses, and Anesthesiologists to Reduce Failures in Communication

Overview
Journal Arch Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Jan 23
PMID 18209148
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess whether structured team briefings improve operating room communication.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This 13-month prospective study used a preintervention/postintervention design. All staff and trainees in the division of general surgery at a Canadian academic tertiary care hospital were invited to participate. Participants included 11 general surgeons, 24 surgical trainees, 41 operating room nurses, 28 anesthesiologists, and 24 anesthesia trainees.

Intervention: Surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists gathered before 302 patient procedures for a short team briefing structured by a checklist. Main Outcome Measure The primary outcome measure was the number of communication failures (late, inaccurate, unresolved, or exclusive communication) per procedure. Communication failures and their consequences were documented by 1 of 4 trained observers using a validated observational scale. Secondary outcomes were the number of checklist briefings that demonstrated "utility" (an effect on the knowledge or actions of the team) and participants' perceptions of the briefing experience.

Results: One hundred seventy-two procedures were observed (86 preintervention, 86 postintervention). The mean (SD) number of communication failures per procedure declined from 3.95 (3.20) before the intervention to 1.31 (1.53) after the intervention (P < .001). Thirty-four percent of briefings demonstrated utility, including identification of problems, resolution of critical knowledge gaps, decision-making, and follow-up actions.

Conclusions: Interprofessional checklist briefings reduced the number of communication failures and promoted proactive and collaborative team communication.

Citing Articles

Digital standardization in liver surgery through a surgical workflow management system: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Haak F, Muller P, Kollmar O, Billeter A, Lavanchy J, Wiencierz A Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):96.

PMID: 40069334 PMC: 11897067. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03634-7.


Use of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist among Surgeons in Tamil Nadu and Its Impact in a Surgical Unit.

Dhinahar B, Sundararaj D, Sundararaj T, Dhinahar C, Arnold J, Shivashankara A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 5):S4850-S4854.

PMID: 40061641 PMC: 11888707. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1332_24.


The surgical time-out: the relationship between perceptions of a safety-task anchor and surgical team workflow.

Zagarese V, Hernandez I, Hauenstein N, Foti R, Parker S BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):55.

PMID: 39910538 PMC: 11796080. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02789-w.


Perceptions and Experiences of Surgical Nurses in Using the WHO Checklist in a Perioperative Setting: a Mixed-method Study.

Seffo N, Custovic S, Alic J, Krupic F Mater Sociomed. 2025; 36(3):229-235.

PMID: 39749149 PMC: 11693123. DOI: 10.5455/msm.2024.36.229-235.


Design Approaches for Developing Quality Checklists in Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review.

Kwong E, Cole A, Sippo D, Yu F, Adapa K, Shea C medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39398986 PMC: 11469382. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.27.24314468.