» Articles » PMID: 18208501

Psychometric Validation of a Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire for Use in Men with Premature Ejaculation or Erectile Dysfunction

Overview
Journal J Sex Med
Date 2008 Jan 23
PMID 18208501
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: An instrument that can systematically capture the impact of sexual dysfunction on quality of life (QoL) in men is needed.

Aims: To psychometrically validate a sexual QoL instrument for men (SQOL-M) with premature ejaculation (PE) or erectile dysfunction (ED).

Methods: The main assessment populations were men participating in clinical trials of treatments for PE or ED. Men with PE had a confirmed intravaginal ejaculatory latency time of < or = 2 minutes in > or = 70% of attempts. Men with ED had a score of > 21 on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Confirmatory psychometric testing was conducted in further groups of men with PE.

Main Outcome Measures: The internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and known-groups validity of the instrument were assessed.

Results: An 11-item version of the SQOL-M was produced following factor analyses on men with either PE or ED. Psychometric testing showed no overlap between items and good item-total correlations. Factor analysis confirmed a one-factor solution. Excellent internal consistency was demonstrated, with a Cronbach's alpha of > or = 0.82 in all groups. In men reporting no change in their symptoms, the SQOL-M showed excellent test-retest reliability: the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.77 for men with PE, and 0.79 for men with ED. Convergent validity was also good. In men with PE, the SQOL-M correlated with the satisfaction and distress domains of the Index of Premature Ejaculation. In men with ED, the SQOL-M correlated with the overall satisfaction domain of the IIEF. The measure also demonstrated excellent discriminant validity between men with PE or ED and men with no sexual dysfunction (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The SQOL-M instrument is a useful tool for evaluating sexual QoL in men with PE and ED.

Citing Articles

Sexual Quality of Life in Subjective Tinnitus Individuals With Normal Hearing: A Case-Control Study.

Asta B, Ozturk Ozdes N, Aydogan Z, Uzdil N, Anadolu R, Yilmaz S Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70357.

PMID: 39972985 PMC: 11839758. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70357.


Development of the Indonesian sexual quality of life scale for women (ISQOL-W).

Hadiprajitno P, Ediati A, Ariani M, Muniroh M, Juniarto A Narra J. 2025; 4(3):e1073.

PMID: 39816063 PMC: 11731793. DOI: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1073.


A Prospective, Longitudinal Comparison of Sexual Distress Across Relationship Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Mooney K, Mulroy M, Park J, Pukall C Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(6):2237-2251.

PMID: 38652408 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02835-3.


Contraceptive use and sexual quality of life of patients with thalassemia in Northern Cyprus: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Tastan S, Ciftci H Afr Health Sci. 2024; 23(3):70-78.

PMID: 38357181 PMC: 10862598. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.10.


Measuring population health and quality of life: Developing and testing of the significant quality of life measure (SigQOLM).

Bujang M, Lai W, Hon Y, Yap E, Tiong X, Ratnasingam S Heliyon. 2023; 9(12):e22668.

PMID: 38149205 PMC: 10750041. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22668.