» Articles » PMID: 18201648

Screening for Prostate Cancer in U.S. Men ACPM Position Statement on Preventive Practice

Overview
Journal Am J Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Jan 19
PMID 18201648
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the leading cancer in U.S. men, and the third leading cause of cancer deaths. Principal screening tests for detection of asymptomatic prostate cancer include digital rectal examination (DRE) and measurement of the serum tumor marker, prostate-specific antigen (PSA). There are risks and benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Randomized controlled trials of screening by DRE and PSA are limited to two previously published studies. Two other large-scale randomized controlled trials are currently in progress.

Methods: This study reviewed the efficacy of DRE and PSA for prostate cancer screening found in the medical literature prior to July 2007.

Results: Applications of PSA screening tests used in clinical practice include (1) a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/ml, (2) age-specific PSA, (3) PSA velocity, (4) PSA density, and (5) percent free PSA. Prostate cancer screening can detect early disease and offers the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality. Prostate cancer screening benefits, however, remain unproven, pending results of ongoing trials. There is currently no convincing evidence that early screening, detection, and treatment improves mortality. Limitations of prostate cancer screening include potential adverse health effects associated with false-positive and negative results, and treatment side effects.

Conclusions: The American College of Preventive Medicine concludes that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine population screening with DRE or PSA. Clinicians caring for men, especially African-American men and those with positive family histories, should provide information about potential benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening, and the limitations of current evidence for screening, in order to maximize informed decision making.

Citing Articles

Diversity, equity, and inclusion in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA novel drug approval: An assessment of the FDA center for drug evaluation and research drug trials snapshot.

Matthew-Onabanjo A, Nortey G, Matulewicz R, Basak R, Culton D, Weaver K Curr Probl Cancer. 2023; 47(3):100958.

PMID: 37084464 PMC: 10523926. DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100958.


Systematic Review of Focal and Salvage Cryotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Chin Y, Lynn N Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e26400.

PMID: 35911314 PMC: 9333556. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26400.


Genetic Evaluation for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among African Americans: A Critical Review.

Khan A, Rogers C, Kennedy C, Lopez A, Jeter J Oncologist. 2022; 27(4):285-291.

PMID: 35380723 PMC: 8982373. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab082.


A Systems Approach to Interrogate Gene Expression Patterns in African American Men Presenting with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Hardiman G, Savage S, Hazard E, da Silveira W, Morgan R, Harris A Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(20).

PMID: 34680291 PMC: 8533960. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205143.


Causation of increased prostate cancer in young men.

Bleyer A, Spreafico F, Barr R Oncoscience. 2021; 8:37-39.

PMID: 33884284 PMC: 8045966. DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.527.