» Articles » PMID: 18195370

Food Limitation Leads to Behavioral Diversification and Dietary Specialization in Sea Otters

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Jan 16
PMID 18195370
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dietary diversity often varies inversely with prey resource abundance. This pattern, although typically measured at the population level, is usually assumed to also characterize the behavior of individual animals within the population. However, the pattern might also be produced by changes in the degree of variation among individuals. Here we report on dietary and associated behavioral changes that occurred with the experimental translocation of sea otters from a food-poor to a food-rich environment. Although the diets of all individuals were broadly similar in the food-rich environment, a behaviorally based dietary polymorphism existed in the food-poor environment. Higher dietary diversity under low resource abundance was largely driven by greater variation among individuals. We further show that the dietary polymorphism in the food-poor environment included a broad suite of correlated behavioral variables and that the individuals that comprised specific behavioral clusters benefited from improved foraging efficiency on their individually preferred prey. Our findings add to the growing list of examples of extreme individuality in behavior and prey choice within populations and suggest that this phenomenon can emerge as a behavioral manifestation of increased population density. Individuality in foraging behavior adds complexity to both the fitness consequences of prey selection and food web dynamics, and it may figure prominently as a diversifying process over evolutionary timescales.

Citing Articles

Dietary specialization among individual squid: using as a case and meta-analysis for other squid species.

Lin D, Zang N, Song W, Punt A, Gong Y, Li G Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20242591.

PMID: 40041962 PMC: 11881021. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2591.


Temporal habitat partitioning and resource competition between congenerics: Testing for density-dependent growth and mortality in estuarine shrimp.

Dunn R, Kimball M, Pfirrmann B, Bruck A, Lane W PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316219.

PMID: 39729451 PMC: 11676493. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316219.


The global diet diversity spectrum in avian apex predators.

DeLong J, Coblentz K, La Sorte F, Uiterwaal S Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20242156.

PMID: 39657802 PMC: 11631488. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2156.


The effect of a harmful algal bloom (Karenia selliformis) on the benthic invertebrate community and the sea otter (Enhydra lutris) diet in eastern Hokkaido.

Johnstone J, Suzuki I, Davis R, Konno N, Murayama K, Ochiai S PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0303126.

PMID: 39570999 PMC: 11581392. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303126.


Data needs for sea otter bioenergetics modeling.

Griffen B, Klimes L, Fletcher L, Thometz N Conserv Physiol. 2024; 12(1):coae067.

PMID: 39391558 PMC: 11465142. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coae067.


References
1.
Kondoh M . Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science. 2003; 299(5611):1388-91. DOI: 10.1126/science.1079154. View

2.
Bolnick D, Svanback R, Fordyce J, Yang L, Davis J, Hulsey C . The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat. 2003; 161(1):1-28. DOI: 10.1086/343878. View

3.
Krutzen M, Mann J, Heithaus M, Connor R, Bejder L, Sherwin W . Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(25):8939-43. PMC: 1157020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500232102. View

4.
Werner T, Sherry T . Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the "Darwin's Finch" of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84(15):5506-10. PMC: 298888. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5506. View

5.
Laidre K, Estes J, Tinker M, Bodkin J, Monson D, Schneider K . Patterns of growth and body condition in sea otters from the Aleutian archipelago before and after the recent population decline. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75(4):978-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01117.x. View