» Articles » PMID: 18193414

Head Position-based Electrotactile Tongue Biofeedback Affects Postural Responses to Achilles Tendon Vibration in Humans

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Jan 15
PMID 18193414
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to investigate whether postural responses to ankle proprioceptive perturbation Achilles tendon vibration were affected by the availability of augmented sensory information about head orientation/motion with respect to gravitational vertical, i.e., normally provided by the vestibular system. To achieve this goal, ten standing subjects were exposed to Achilles tendon vibration in two No Biofeedback and Biofeedback conditions. The No Biofeedback condition served as a control condition. In the Biofeedback condition, subjects performed the postural task using a head position-based electrotactile tongue-placed biofeedback system. Center of foot pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded using a force platform. Results showed that (1) Achilles tendon vibration increased CoP displacements in the No Biofeedback condition and (2) this destabilizing effect was less accentuated in the Biofeedback condition. These results are consistent with and discussed in terms of sensory re-weighting mechanisms involved in postural control. In the condition of Achilles tendon vibration, which renders ankle proprioceptive information less reliable for controlling posture, the central nervous system was able to integrate alternatively available augmented sensory information suitable and usable in upright postural control to reduce the destabilizing effect of the ankle proprioceptive perturbation.

Citing Articles

Vibration-induced postural reactions: a scoping review on parameters and populations studied.

Bertrand-Charette M, Perron M, DA Silva R, Beaulieu L Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1307639.

PMID: 38234593 PMC: 10791994. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1307639.


Trunk velocity-dependent Light Touch reduces postural sway during standing.

Saini A, Burns D, Emmett D, Song Y PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224943.

PMID: 31697773 PMC: 6837461. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224943.


The tongue display unit (TDU) for electrotactile spatiotemporal pattern presentation.

Kaczmarek K Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng. 2017; 18(6):1476-1485.

PMID: 28748231 PMC: 5523951. DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2011.08.020.


Changes in the diurnal rhythms during a 45-day head-down bed rest.

Liang X, Zhang L, Wan Y, Yu X, Guo Y, Chen X PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47984.

PMID: 23110150 PMC: 3480480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047984.


Responses to Achilles tendon vibration during self-paced, visually and auditory-guided periodic sway.

Radhakrishnan S, Hatzitaki V, Patikas D, Amiridis I Exp Brain Res. 2011; 213(4):423-33.

PMID: 21748332 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2792-y.


References
1.
Vuillerme N, Pinsault N, Chenu O, Boisgontier M, Demongeot J, Payan Y . How a plantar pressure-based, tongue-placed tactile biofeedback modifies postural control mechanisms during quiet standing. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 181(4):547-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0953-9. View

2.
Tyler M, Danilov Y, Bach-Y-Rita P . Closing an open-loop control system: vestibular substitution through the tongue. J Integr Neurosci. 2004; 2(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1142/s0219635203000263. View

3.
Peterka R . Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 88(3):1097-118. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097. View

4.
Vuillerme N, Pinsault N, Vaillant J . Postural control during quiet standing following cervical muscular fatigue: effects of changes in sensory inputs. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 378(3):135-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.024. View

5.
Roll J, Vedel J, Ribot E . Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 76(1):213-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00253639. View