» Articles » PMID: 18193353

New Cutpoints to Identify Increased HER2 Copy Number: Analysis of a Large, Population-based Cohort with Long-term Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Jan 15
PMID 18193353
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: HER2 gene amplification and/or protein overexpression in breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and predicts response to anti-HER2 therapy. We examine the natural history of breast cancers in relationship to increased HER2 copy numbers in a large population-based study.

Patients And Methods: HER2 status was measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in approximately 1,400 breast cancer cases with greater than 15 years of follow-up. Protein expression was evaluated with two different commercially-available antibodies.

Results: We looked for subgroups of breast cancer with different clinical outcomes, based on HER2 FISH amplification ratio. The current HER2 ratio cut point for classifying HER2 positive and negative cases is 2.2. However, we found an increased risk of disease-specific death associated with FISH ratios of >1.5. An 'intermediate' group of cases with HER2 ratios between 1.5 and 2.2 was found to have a significantly better outcome than the conventional 'amplified' group (HER2 ratio >2.2) but a significantly worse outcome than groups with FISH ratios less than 1.5.

Conclusion: Breast cancers with increased HER2 copy numbers (low level HER2 amplification), below the currently accepted positive threshold ratio of 2.2, showed a distinct, intermediate outcome when compared to HER2 unamplified tumors and tumors with HER2 ratios greater than 2.2. These findings suggest that a new cut point to determine HER2 positivity, at a ratio of 1.5 (well below the current recommended cut point of 2.2), should be evaluated.

Citing Articles

Age-correlated protein and transcript expression in breast cancer and normal breast tissues is dominated by host endocrine effects.

Osako T, Lee H, Turashvili G, Chiu D, McKinney S, Joosten S Nat Cancer. 2022; 1(5):518-532.

PMID: 35121983 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0060-4.


TTSurv: Exploring the Multi-Gene Prognosis in Thousands of Tumors.

Qi Y, Xin M, Zhang Y, Hao Y, Liu Q, Wang P Front Oncol. 2021; 11:691310.

PMID: 34113575 PMC: 8186665. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.691310.


Prognostic significance of equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results and clinical utility of alternative chromosome 17 genes in patients with invasive breast cancer: A cohort study.

Sneige N, Hess K, Multani A, Gong Y, Ibrahim N Cancer. 2016; 123(7):1115-1123.

PMID: 27893937 PMC: 5372352. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30460.


Comparative studies of TIMP-1 immunohistochemistry, TIMP-1 FISH analysis and plasma TIMP-1 in glioblastoma patients.

Aaberg-Jessen C, Halle B, Jensen S, Muller S, Romer U, Pedersen C J Neurooncol. 2016; 130(3):439-448.

PMID: 27619981 PMC: 5118392. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2252-4.


Estrogen receptor alpha gene amplification in breast cancer: 25 years of debate.

Holst F World J Clin Oncol. 2016; 7(2):160-73.

PMID: 27081639 PMC: 4826962. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i2.160.