» Articles » PMID: 18192493

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Functional Knee Brace and Neoprene Sleeve Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Jan 15
PMID 18192493
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite a lack of evidence for their effectiveness, functional knee braces are commonly prescribed to patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Purpose: This trial was conducted to compare postoperative outcomes in patients using an ACL functional knee brace and patients using a neoprene knee sleeve.

Hypothesis: Patients using a brace will have superior outcomes than those using a sleeve.

Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive a brace (n = 76) or neoprene sleeve (n = 74) at their 6-week postoperative visit after primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients were assessed preoperatively, then 6 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Outcome measures included disease-specific quality of life (Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life [ACL-QOL] Questionnaire), anterior tibial translation (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference), the single-limb forward hop test (limb symmetry index), and Tegner Activity Scale. Outcomes at 1 and 2 years were compared after adjusting for baseline scores. Subjective ratings of how patients felt while using the brace/sleeve were also collected for descriptive purposes using a questionnaire. Four a priori directional subgroup hypotheses were evaluated using tests for interactions.

Results: There were no significant differences between brace (n = 62) and sleeve (n = 65) groups for any of the outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Adjusted mean differences at 2 years were as follows: -0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.52 to 5.64) for the ACL-QOL Questionnaire, -0.10 mm (95% CI, -0.99 to 0.81) for KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, -0.87% (95% CI, -8.89 to 7.12) for hop limb symmetry index, and -0.05 (95% CI, -0.72 to 0.62) for the Tegner Activity Scale. Subjective ratings of confidence in the knee provided by the brace/sleeve were higher for the brace group than the sleeve group. Subgroup findings were minimal. Adverse events were few and similar between groups.

Conclusions: A functional knee brace does not result in superior outcomes compared with a neoprene sleeve after ACL reconstruction. Current evidence does not support the recommendation of using an ACL functional knee brace after ACL reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Functions and Effectiveness of Unloader, Patellofemoral, and Knee Sleeve Orthoses: A Review.

Dzidotor G, Moorhead Jr J, Ude C, Ogueri K, Ghosh D, Laurencin C Regen Eng Transl Med. 2024; 10(2):147-171.

PMID: 38983777 PMC: 11233114. DOI: 10.1007/s40883-023-00313-1.


Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Skeletally Immature Patients.

Bixby E, Heyworth B Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024; 17(7):258-272.

PMID: 38639870 PMC: 11156825. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09897-9.


Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation-A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Schoepp C, Ohmann T, Martin W, Praetorius A, Seelmann C, Dudda M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 36902868 PMC: 10004240. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052074.


Can a knee sleeve influence ground reaction forces and knee joint power during a step-down hop in participants following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A secondary analysis.

Sole G, Pataky T, Hammer N, Lamb P PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0272677.

PMID: 36525413 PMC: 9757553. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272677.


Prescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction?.

Yapici F, Gur V, Sari I, Koksal A, Yurten H, Ucpunar H Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 68(3):355-363.

PMID: 36475105 PMC: 9706800. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8906.