» Articles » PMID: 18184340

Clinical Characteristics at Implants with a History of Progressive Bone Loss

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2008 Jan 11
PMID 18184340
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical characteristics at implants with a history of progressive bone loss.

Material And Methods: Eighty-two out of 184 previously identified subjects with a history of progressive bone loss volunteered for the study. Clinical assessments of plaque, bleeding on probing (BoP), probing pocket depth (PPD), suppuration following probing (Pus), presence of calculus on implants surfaces (Calc) and 'recession' i.e. the mucosal margin in level with or apical of the fixture/abutment junction were performed at the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual aspects of each implant and without removing the bridge constructions.

Results: It was demonstrated that the frequencies of BoP, Pus, 'recession' and PPD > or = 6 mm were higher at implants with than without 'progressive' bone loss. In addition, smokers had larger numbers of affected implants than non-smokers, and the proportion of affected implants that exhibited Pus and PPD > or = 6 mm was higher in smokers than in non-smokers. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the findings of Pus, 'recession' and PPD > or = 6 mm at an implant in a smoking subject had a 69% accuracy in identifying the history of progressive bone loss.

Conclusion: The results from this study demonstrate an association between clinical signs of pathology and bone loss at implants. It is recommended to include clinical assessments in the evaluation of implant therapy.

Citing Articles

Salivary Inflammatory Mediator Profiles in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Health and Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Titusson C, Jansson L, Modin C, Lundmark A, Eriksson K, Adler L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025; 27(1):e70002.

PMID: 39876538 PMC: 11775428. DOI: 10.1111/cid.70002.


Influence of Implant Location, Number, and Design in Ischemic Zone for Implant Prosthesis Success Rate: A Comparative Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Sayed A, Garg K, Mohan S, Tareen S, Shiva Shankar B, Omran M Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53881.

PMID: 38465182 PMC: 10925053. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53881.


Clinical outcomes of narrow- and regular-diameter implants with bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Wen G, Dong W Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(3):196.

PMID: 38443497 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05588-4.


Novel Flowchart Guiding the Non-Surgical and Surgical Management of Peri-Implant Complications: A Narrative Review.

Shiba T, Komatsu K, Takeuchi Y, Koyanagi T, Taniguchi Y, Takagi T Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391604 PMC: 10885994. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020118.


Prevalence of bone loss surrounding dental implants as detected in cone beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional study.

Algahtani F, Hebbal M, Alqarni M, Alaamer R, Alqahtani A, Almohareb R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15770.

PMID: 37551351 PMC: 10404392. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15770.