» Articles » PMID: 18174939

Test-retest Reliability of Computerized Concussion Assessment Programs

Overview
Journal J Athl Train
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Jan 5
PMID 18174939
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Computer-based neurocognitive assessment programs commonly are used to assist in concussion diagnosis and management. These tests have been adopted readily by many clinicians based on existing test-retest reliability data provided by test developers.

Objective: To examine the test-retest reliability of 3 commercially available computer-based neurocognitive assessments using clinically relevant time frames.

Design: Repeated-measures design.

Setting: Research laboratory.

Patients Or Other Participants: 118 healthy student volunteers.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The participants completed the ImPACT, Concussion Sentinel, and Headminder Concussion Resolution Index tests on 3 days: baseline, day 45, and day 50. Each participant also completed the Green Memory and Concentration Test to evaluate effort. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for all output scores generated by each computer program as an estimate of test-retest reliability.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient estimates from baseline to day 45 assessments ranged from .15 to .39 on the ImPACT, .23 to .65 on the Concussion Sentinel, and .15 to .66 on the Concussion Resolution Index. The intraclass correlation coefficient estimates from the day 45 to day 50 assessments ranged from .39 to .61 on the ImPACT, .39 to .66 on the Concussion Sentinel, and .03 to .66 on the Concussion Resolution Index. All participants demonstrated high levels of effort on all days of testing, according to Memory and Concentration Test interpretive guidelines.

Conclusions: Three contemporary computer-based concussion assessment programs evidenced low to moderate test-retest reliability coefficients. Our findings do not appear to be due to suboptimal effort or other factors related to poor test performance, because persons identified by individual programs as having poor baseline data were excluded from the analyses. The neurocognitive evaluation should continue to be part of a multifaceted concussion assessment program, with priority given to those scores showing the highest reliability.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of biomarkers and imaging techniques for the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury: challenges and opportunities.

Duerksen J, Lopez R, Tappia P, Ramjiawan B, Mansouri B Mol Cell Biochem. 2024; .

PMID: 39656395 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-024-05176-w.


Frequency of low ImPACT scores among adolescent and young adult student-athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and/or learning disorder.

Schatz P, Cuzzupe J, Karr J, Cook N, Iverson G Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1446962.

PMID: 39628895 PMC: 11611859. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1446962.


Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.

Quigley K, Fenner M, Pavilionis P, Constantino N, Moran R, Murray N Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024; 39(5):626-634.

PMID: 38273670 PMC: 11269890. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acae002.


Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis.

Chen L, Zhen W, Peng D Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1227261.

PMID: 37680449 PMC: 10482043. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227261.


Clinical Assessment of Concussion and Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms for Neurologists.

Leddy J, Haider M, Noble J, Rieger B, Flanagan S, McPherson J Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021; 21(12):70.

PMID: 34817724 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-021-01159-2.


References
1.
Guskiewicz K, Riemann B, Perrin D, Nashner L . Alternative approaches to the assessment of mild head injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29(7 Suppl):S213-21. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199707001-00003. View

2.
Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Wald M . The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21(5):375-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001. View

3.
Pellman E, Lovell M, Viano D, Casson I, Tucker A . Concussion in professional football: neuropsychological testing--part 6. Neurosurgery. 2004; 55(6):1290-303. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000149244.97560.91. View

4.
Collie A, Makdissi M, Maruff P, Bennell K, McCrory P . Cognition in the days following concussion: comparison of symptomatic versus asymptomatic athletes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77(2):241-5. PMC: 2077582. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073155. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View