School-aged Children Exhibit Domain-specific Responses to Biological Motion

Overview

Journal Soc Neurosci

Publisher Routledge

Date 2008 Jan 5

PMID 18174911

Citations 36

Authors

Elizabeth J Carter

Kevin A Pelphrey

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Prior studies have implicated the superior temporal sulcus region for processing various types of biological motion in children and adults. However, no previous research in children compared this activity to that involved in coherent, meaningful, non-biological motion perception to show specificity for biological motion processing. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore which brain regions were specific for biological motion in 7- to 10-year-old children. We compared brain activity in response to biological motion by a biological figure (a walking human); biological motion by a non-biological figure (a walking robot); disorganized, non-biological motion by a disjointed mechanical figure; and organized, non-biological motion by a grandfather clock. We identified a network of brain regions that had a greater response evoked by biological than by non-biological motion, including the superior temporal sulcus and mirror neuron regions. Additionally, we found a developmental change suggesting increasing specificity for biological motion with age in the superior temporal sulcus region. We discuss these results in the context of research and theory that has emphasized the important role of biological motion perception in the development of theory-of-mind abilities.

Citing Articles

Phonological and Semantic Specialization in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children During Auditory Word Processing.

Wang J, Yamasaki B, Booth J Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 4(2):297-317.

PMID: 37229511 PMC: 10205156. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00099.

Alternative Brain Connectivity Underscores Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Interactive Biological Motion.

Walbrin J, Almeida J, Koldewyn K J Neurosci. 2023; 43(20):3666-3674.

PMID: 36963845 PMC: 10198447. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2109-22.2023.

Developmental differences in the perception of naturalistic human movements.

Ntoumanis I, Shestakova A, Koriakina M, Kadieva D, Kopytin G, Jaaskelainen I Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1046277.

PMID: 36704095 PMC: 9872020. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1046277.

Preference for biological motion is reduced in ASD: implications for clinical trials and the search for biomarkers.

Mason L, Shic F, Falck-Ytter T, Chakrabarti B, Charman T, Loth E Mol Autism. 2021; 12(1):74.

PMID: 34911565 PMC: 8672507. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-021-00476-0.

Preferential responses to faces in superior temporal and medial prefrontal cortex in three-year-old children.

Richardson H, Taylor J, Kane-Grade F, Powell L, Bosquet Enlow M, Nelson C Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021; 50:100984.

PMID: 34246062 PMC: 8274289. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100984.

References

Pelphrey K, Morris J, McCarthy G . Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 16(10):1706-16. DOI: 10.1162/0898929042947900. View

Wellman H, Cross D, Watson J . Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. 2001; 72(3):655-84. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00304. View

Dumoulin S, Bittar R, Kabani N, Baker Jr C, Le Goualher G, Pike G . A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10(5):454-63. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.5.454. View

Taylor M, Edmonds G, McCarthy G, Allison T . Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children. Neuroreport. 2001; 12(8):1671-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200106130-00031. View

Aylward E, Park J, Field K, PARSONS A, Richards T, Cramer S . Brain activation during face perception: evidence of a developmental change. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(2):308-19. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053124884. View

Gallagher H, Frith C . Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00025-6. View

Pelphrey K, Viola R, McCarthy G . When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(9):598-603. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00726.x. View

Grossman E, Blake R . Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion. Neuron. 2002; 35(6):1167-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00897-8. View

Perner J, Frith U, Leslie A, Leekam S . Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Dev. 1989; 60(3):688-700. View

10.

Zeki S, Watson J, Lueck C, Friston K, Kennard C, Frackowiak R . A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1991; 11(3):641-9. PMC: 6575357. View

11.

Saxe R, Xiao D, Kovacs G, Perrett D, Kanwisher N . A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(11):1435-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.015. View

12.

Guo H, Song A . Single-shot spiral image acquisition with embedded z-shimming for susceptibility signal recovery. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003; 18(3):389-95. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10355. View

13.

Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry D, Evans A . Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(11):3737-44. PMC: 6578830. View

14.

Happe F . The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Dev. 1995; 66(3):843-55. View

15.

Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V . Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001; 13(2):400-4. View

16.

Allison , Puce , McCarthy . Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(7):267-278. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1. View

17.

Pelphrey K, Morris J, McCarthy G . Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 5):1038-48. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh404. View

18.

Mitchell J, Heatherton T, Neil Macrae C . Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(23):15238-43. PMC: 137574. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.232395699. View

19.

Fox R, McDaniel C . The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science. 1982; 218(4571):486-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.7123249. View

20.

Castelli F, Frith C, Happe F, Frith U . Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 8):1839-49. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf189. View