» Articles » PMID: 18165751

Clinical Decision Rules for Identification of Low Back Pain Patients with Neurologic Involvement in Primary Care

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Jan 1
PMID 18165751
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Descriptive study.

Objective: To compare clinical decision rules in low back pain guidelines for identification of neurologic involvement.

Summary Of Background Data: Low back pain guidelines have been developed in a number of countries. Guideline recommendations for assessment of patients with low back pain in primary care include clinical decision rules for identification of neurologic involvement. Broad variation in recommended clinical assessments has previously been identified. More specific investigation of these clinical assessments seems warranted given that guidelines have an important role in facilitating accurate and timely identification of neurologic involvement in patients with low back pain presenting in primary care.

Methods: Guidelines were included that met the following criteria: the guideline included clinical decision rules for low back pain assessments; recommendations were for clinical management of low back pain in primary care; and the guideline was available in English.

Results: Three categories of neurologic involvement were identified in the guidelines: cauda equina syndrome; nerve root syndrome; and spinal stenosis. However, only cauda equina syndrome was included in all guidelines. Spinal stenosis or both nerve root syndrome and spinal stenosis categories were omitted from some guidelines. Decision factors for assignment to categories were: generally consistent for cauda equina syndrome; agreed to be conduction block in sensory and motor nerves and pain on straight leg raise for nerve root syndrome; and agreed to be reduced walking distance resulting from pseudoclaudication for spinal stenosis. Disagreement related to postural factors for nerve root syndrome and spinal stenosis categories.

Conclusion: This study has identified differences between the guidelines in the clinical decision rules for identification of neurologic involvement including omission of categories. Decision-making that employs all 3 categories of neurologic involvement will arguably facilitate accurate and timely identification of patients with low back pain so affected in primary care.

Citing Articles

Steroids and L-Lysine Aescinate for Acute Radiculopathy Due to a Herniated Lumbar Disk.

Oros M, Oros Jar M, Grabar V Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(11).

PMID: 31739434 PMC: 6915681. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55110736.


Factors associated with costs and health outcomes in patients with Back and leg pain in primary care: a prospective cohort analysis.

Kigozi J, Konstantinou K, Ogollah R, Dunn K, Martyn L, Jowett S BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):406.

PMID: 31226997 PMC: 6588896. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4257-0.


The profile of chiropractors managing patients with low back-related leg pain: analyses of 1907 chiropractors from the ACORN practice-based research network.

Fernandez M, Moore C, Peng W, de Luca K, Pohlman K, Swain M Chiropr Man Therap. 2019; 27:19.

PMID: 31015956 PMC: 6469207. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0239-x.


Initial pain and disability characteristics can assist the prediction of the centralization phenomenon on initial assessment of patients with low back pain.

Rabin A, Shmushkevich Y, Kalichman L J Man Manip Ther. 2019; 27(2):66-72.

PMID: 30935340 PMC: 6484501. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1542560.


Involuntary hamstring muscle activity reduces passive hip range of motion during the straight leg raise test: a stimulation study in healthy people.

Foo Y, Heroux M, Chia L, Diong J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):130.

PMID: 30917805 PMC: 6437839. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2511-6.