» Articles » PMID: 18162116

Evaluation of 280,000 Cases in Dutch Midwifery Practices: a Descriptive Study

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2007 Dec 29
PMID 18162116
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the nature and outcome of intrapartum referrals from primary to secondary care within the Dutch obstetric system.

Design: Descriptive study.

Setting: Dutch midwifery database (LVR1), covering 95% of all midwifery care and 80% of all Dutch pregnancies (2001-03).

Population: Low-risk women (280,097) under exclusive care of a primary level midwife at the start of labour either with intention to deliver at home or with a personal preference to deliver in hospital under care of a primary level midwife.

Methods: Women were classified into three categories (no referral, urgent referral and referral without urgency) and were related to maternal characteristics and to neonatal outcomes.

Main Outcome Measures: Distribution of referral categories, main reasons for urgent referral, Apgar score at 5 minutes, perinatal death within 24 hours and referral to a paediatrician within 24 hours.

Results: In our study, 68.1% of the women completed childbirth under exclusive care of a midwife, 3.6% were referred on an urgency basis and 28.3% were referred without urgency. Of all referrals, 11.2% were on an urgency basis. The main reasons for urgent referrals were fetal distress and postpartum haemorrhage. The nonurgent referrals predominantly took place during the first stage of labour (73.6% of all referrals). Women who had planned a home delivery were referred less frequently than women who had planned a hospital delivery: 29.3 and 37.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). On average, the mean Apgar score at 5 minutes was high (9.72%) and the peripartum neonatal mortality was low (0.05%) in the total study group. No maternal deaths occurred. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred most frequently in the urgent referral group, followed by the group of referrals without urgency and the nonreferred group.

Conclusions: Risk selection is a crucial element of the Dutch obstetric system and continues into the postpartum period. The system results in a relatively small percentage of intrapartum urgent referrals and in overall satisfactory neonatal outcomes in deliveries led by primary level midwives.

Citing Articles

Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Following Hospital Transfers of Home Births and Births in Midwife-led Units in Austria.

Schildberger B, Riedmann M, Leitner H, Stelzl P Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024; 84(3):264-273.

PMID: 38456000 PMC: 10917609. DOI: 10.1055/a-2249-7228.


A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science.

Li T, Zeng Y, Fan X, Yang J, Yang C, Xiong Q J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:677-692.

PMID: 36938484 PMC: 10015947. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S398218.


Women who smoke during pregnancy are more likely to be referred to an obstetrician during pregnancy and birth: results from a cohort study.

Weiland S, Peters L, Berger M, Erwich J, Jansen D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):479.

PMID: 35698051 PMC: 9190098. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04808-7.


Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Goodarzi B, Walker A, Holten L, Schoonmade L, Teunissen P, Schellevis F PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234252.

PMID: 32511258 PMC: 7279596. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234252.


Through the professional's eyes: transfers of care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period.

van Stenus C, Poorthuis M, Boere-Boonekamp M, Need A BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):108.

PMID: 32046700 PMC: 7014703. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4941-0.