» Articles » PMID: 18158982

The Oncology Acute Toxicity Unit (OATU): an Outpatient Facility for Improving the Management of Chemotherapy Toxicity

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Dec 27
PMID 18158982
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To provide an outpatient facility to improve the management of chemotherapy toxicity in cancer patients.

Patients And Methods: We set up an oncology acute toxicity unit (OATU) to improve toxicity management. A telephone helpline was the initial contact which filters out inappropriate non-toxicity-related events. Patients were provided an information booklet describing the possible side effects of the chemotherapy and the helpline telephone number. A specialist nurse received the calls and consulted the doctor if necessary. Depending on requirements, the patient's problem was resolved by telephone, or a consultation visit at the OATU was arranged.

Results: Between February 1999 and August 2001, 1126 patients made 2007 contacts with the OATU. The most common tumours were breast (26%), colorectal (20%) and lung (20%). The telephone helpline was used in 87% of contacts and 37% were considered inappropriate. Of the 1263 appropriate contacts, the most frequent chemotherapy schedules that had been administered were 5FU-leucovorin (11.2%) and CMF (10.4%). The most frequent side effects were fever (35.5%), diarrhoea (18.5%), mucositis (16.2%) and emesis (13%). The problem was resolved by telephone in 48% of cases and 52% required attendance in the OATU, of which 40% required hospital admission, i.e., 21.1% of the initial appropriate helpline contacts. The most frequent reason was Grade 3-4 neutropenic fever (56.5%).

Conclusions: The OATU enables prompt and efficient access of patients to medical oncology facilities in the event of toxicity due to chemotherapy. Unnecessary emergency room use is avoided while oncology outpatient and hospitalisation facilities are optimised.

Citing Articles

Reducing emergency department utilization for outpatient acute cancer symptoms: An integrative review on the advent of urgent cancer clinics.

Patel T, Bouchal S, Laing C, Hubbard S Can Oncol Nurs J. 2024; 31(1):22-35.

PMID: 38919464 PMC: 11195557. DOI: 10.5737/236880763112235.


.

Patel T, Bouchal S, Laing C, Hubbard S Can Oncol Nurs J. 2024; 31(1):36-50.

PMID: 38919462 PMC: 11195565. DOI: 10.5737/236880763113650.


Nurse-led emergency department avoidance model of care for patients receiving cancer therapy in the ambulatory setting: a health service improvement initiative.

Mellerick A, Akers G, Tebbutt N, Lane T, Jarden R, Whitfield K BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):710.

PMID: 37386474 PMC: 10311764. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09693-0.


Patterns and Results of Triage Advice Before Emergency Department Visits Made by Patients With Cancer.

Hong A, Chang H, Courtney D, Fullington H, Lee S, Sweetenham J JCO Oncol Pract. 2021; 17(4):e564-e574.

PMID: 33417485 PMC: 8258134. DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.00617.


Assessment of adverse events via a telephone consultation service for cancer patients receiving ambulatory chemotherapy.

Kondo S, Shiba S, Udagawa R, Ryushima Y, Yano M, Uehara T BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:315.

PMID: 26210162 PMC: 4514970. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1292-8.


References
1.
Mitchell E, Schein P . Gastrointestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Semin Oncol. 1982; 9(1):52-64. View

2.
Johnston E, Crawford J . Hematopoietic growth factors in the reduction of chemotherapeutic toxicity. Semin Oncol. 1998; 25(5):552-61. View