Computer-aided Detection in Full-field Digital Mammography: Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Serial Examinations
Affiliations
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity and reproducibility of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system applied to serial digital mammograms obtained in women with breast cancer, with histologic analysis as the reference standard.
Materials And Methods: This study was institutional review board approved, and patient informed consent was waived. A commercially available CAD system was applied to initial and follow-up digital mammograms obtained in 93 women with breast cancer (mean age, 52 years; age range, 32-81 years). The mean interval between mammographic examinations was 23 days (range, 7-58 days). There were 119 visible lesion components (70 masses, 49 microcalcifications). Sensitivity, false-positive mark rate, and reproducibility of the CAD system were evaluated for both sets of mammograms with the t test.
Results: Sensitivities of the CAD system at initial and follow-up digital mammography were 91% and 89%, respectively, for detection of masses. Sensitivity of the CAD system for detection of microcalcifications was 100% at both initial and follow-up digital mammography. Overall false-positive mark rates were 0.29 per image and 0.27 per image at initial and follow-up digital mammography, respectively. When craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views were considered separately, sensitivities were 76% and 75%, respectively, for masses and 96% and 92%, respectively, for microcalcifications. The reproducibility of CAD marks was 80% for true-positive masses, 92% for true-positive microcalcifications, 9% for false-positive masses, and 8% for false-positive microcalcifications (P < .001).
Conclusion: The sensitivity of the CAD system was consistently high for detection of breast cancer on initial and short-term follow-up digital mammograms. Reproducibility was significantly higher for true-positive CAD marks than for false-positive CAD marks.
Supplemental Material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/246/1/71/DC1.
Hejduk P, Marcon M, Unkelbach J, Ciritsis A, Rossi C, Borkowski K Eur Radiol. 2022; 32(7):4868-4878.
PMID: 35147776 PMC: 9213284. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08558-0.
Application of Imaging Technologies in Breast Cancer Detection: A Review Article.
Lima Z, Ebadi M, Amjad G, Younesi L Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(5):838-848.
PMID: 30962849 PMC: 6447343. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.171.
Mohammadi-Sardo S, Labibi F, Shafiei S Radiol Phys Technol. 2019; 12(2):178-184.
PMID: 30931495 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-019-00509-7.
Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning.
Ribli D, Horvath A, Unger Z, Pollner P, Csabai I Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4165.
PMID: 29545529 PMC: 5854668. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z.
Cho K, Seo B, Woo O, Song S, Choi J, Whang S J Breast Cancer. 2016; 19(3):316-323.
PMID: 27721882 PMC: 5053317. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.316.