» Articles » PMID: 18094759

Molecular Sieving Using Nanofilters: Past, Present and Future

Overview
Journal Lab Chip
Specialties Biotechnology
Chemistry
Date 2007 Dec 21
PMID 18094759
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Filtration of molecules by nanometer-sized structures is ubiquitous in our everyday life, but our understanding of such molecular filtration processes is far less than desired. Until recently, one of the main reasons was the lack of experimental methods that can help provide detailed, microscopic pictures of molecule-nanostructure interactions. Several innovations in experimental methods, such as nuclear track-etched membranes developed in the 70s, and more recent development of nanofluidic molecular filters, played pivotal roles in advancing our understanding. With the ability to make truly molecular-scale filters and pores with well-defined sizes, shapes, and surface properties, now we are well positioned to engineer better functionality in molecular sieving, separation and other membrane applications. Reviewing past theoretical developments (often scattered across different fields) and connecting them to the most recent advances in the field would be essential to get a full, unified view on this important engineering question.

Citing Articles

Oxygen Transport in Nanoporous SiN Membrane Compared to PDMS and Polypropylene for Microfluidic ECMO.

Imtiaz N, Stoddard W, Day S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39803510 PMC: 11722228. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.04.631337.


A Critical Review on the Sensing, Control, and Manipulation of Single Molecules on Optofluidic Devices.

Rahman M, Islam K, Islam M, Islam M, Kaysir M, Akter M Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(6).

PMID: 35744582 PMC: 9229244. DOI: 10.3390/mi13060968.


Intrusion of polyethylene glycol into solid-state nanopores.

Sun Y, Xu C, Li Y RSC Adv. 2022; 8(17):9070-9073.

PMID: 35541879 PMC: 9078677. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00329g.


Artificial sodium-selective ionic device based on crown-ether crystals with subnanometer pores.

Ye T, Hou G, Li W, Wang C, Yi K, Liu N Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):5231.

PMID: 34471132 PMC: 8410819. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25597-1.


Comparison of separation modes for microchip electrophoresis of proteins.

Samarasinghe T, Zeng Y, Johnson C J Sep Sci. 2020; 44(3):744-751.

PMID: 33226183 PMC: 8053037. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202000883.


References
1.
Doyle P, Bibette J, Bancaud A, Viovy J . Self-assembled magnetic matrices for DNA separation chips. Science. 2002; 295(5563):2237. DOI: 10.1126/science.1068420. View

2.
FERRY J . STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF SIEVE CONSTANTS IN ULTRAFILTRATION. J Gen Physiol. 2009; 20(1):95-104. PMC: 2141487. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.20.1.95. View

3.
Volkmuth W, Austin R . DNA electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays. Nature. 1992; 358(6387):600-2. DOI: 10.1038/358600a0. View

4.
Turner S, Cabodi M, Craighead H . Confinement-induced entropic recoil of single DNA molecules in a nanofluidic structure. Phys Rev Lett. 2002; 88(12):128103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.128103. View

5.
Zhang C, Manz A . High-speed free-flow electrophoresis on chip. Anal Chem. 2003; 75(21):5759-66. DOI: 10.1021/ac0345190. View