» Articles » PMID: 18087076

Poverty and Blindness in Pakistan: Results from the Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Dec 19
PMID 18087076
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the association between blindness and deprivation in a nationally representative sample of adults in Pakistan.

Design: Cross sectional population based survey.

Setting: 221 rural and urban clusters selected randomly throughout Pakistan.

Participants: Nationally representative sample of 16 507 adults aged 30 or above (95.3% response rate).

Main Outcome Measures: Associations between visual impairment and poverty assessed by a cluster level deprivation index and a household level poverty indicator; prevalence and causes of blindness; measures of the rate of uptake and quality of eye care services.

Results: 561 blind participants (<3/60 in the better eye) were identified during the survey. Clusters in urban Sindh province were the most affluent, whereas rural areas in Balochistan were the poorest. The prevalence of blindness in adults living in affluent clusters was 2.2%, compared with 3.7% in medium clusters and 3.9% in poor clusters (P<0.001 for affluent v poor). The highest prevalence of blindness was found in rural Balochistan (5.2%). The prevalence of total blindness (bilateral no light perception) was more than three times higher in poor clusters than in affluent clusters (0.24% v 0.07%, P<0.001). The prevalences of blindness caused by cataract, glaucoma, and corneal opacity were lower in affluent clusters and households. Reflecting access to eye care services, cataract surgical coverage was higher in affluent clusters (80.6%) than in medium (76.8%) and poor areas (75.1%). Intraocular lens implantation rates were significantly lower in participants from poorer households. 10.2% of adults living in affluent clusters presented to the examination station wearing spectacles, compared with 6.7% in medium clusters and 4.4% in poor cluster areas. Spectacle coverage in affluent areas was more than double that in poor clusters (23.5% v 11.1%, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Blindness is associated with poverty in Pakistan; lower access to eye care services was one contributory factor. To reduce blindness, strategies targeting poor people will be needed. These interventions may have an impact on deprivation in Pakistan.

Citing Articles

Spectacle Coverage Rate After Cataract Surgery in an Urban Area in Indonesia.

Rahayu T, Lestari Y, Ayudianingrum A, Rifati L Clin Optom (Auckl). 2023; 15:167-173.

PMID: 37605767 PMC: 10440109. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S417876.


Prevalence and predictors of vision impairment among older adults in India: evidence from LASI, 2017-18.

Srivastava S, Kumar M, Muhammad T, Debnath P BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):251.

PMID: 37277715 PMC: 10240694. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03009-w.


Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases.

Furtado J, Fernandes A, Silva J, Del Pino S, Hommes C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36900846 PMC: 10000964. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053820.


Socioeconomic position and eye health outcomes: identifying inequality in rapid population-based surveys.

McCormick I, Kim M, Hydara A, Olaniyan S, Jobe M, Badjie O BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e069325.

PMID: 36882236 PMC: 10008479. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069325.


Exploring eye care pathways, patient priorities and economics in Pakistan: A scoping review and expert consultation study with thematic analysis.

Malik M, Strang N, Campbell P, Jonuscheit S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022; 42(4):694-716.

PMID: 35318687 PMC: 9310639. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12977.


References
1.
Vu H, Keeffe J, McCarty C, Taylor H . Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(3):360-3. PMC: 1772562. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.047498. View

2.
Murray C, Lopez A . Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy: global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997; 349(9062):1347-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07494-6. View

3.
Frick K, Foster A, Bah M, Faal H . Analysis of costs and benefits of the Gambian Eye Care Program. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123(2):239-43. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.239. View

4.
Baltussen R, Sylla M, Mariotti S . Cost-effectiveness analysis of cataract surgery: a global and regional analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2004; 82(5):338-45. PMC: 2622839. View

5.
Murthy G, Gupta S, Ellwein L, MUNOZ S, Bachani D, Dada V . A population-based eye survey of older adults in a rural district of Rajasthan: I. Central vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(4):679-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00579-0. View