» Articles » PMID: 18086547

Do Features of Public Open Spaces Vary According to Neighbourhood Socio-economic Status?

Overview
Journal Health Place
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Dec 19
PMID 18086547
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the relations between neighbourhood socio-economic status and features of public open spaces (POS) hypothesised to influence children's physical activity. Data were from the first follow-up of the Children Living in Active Neighbourhoods (CLAN) Study, which involved 540 families of 5-6 and 10-12-year-old children in Melbourne, Australia. The Socio-Economic Index for Areas Index (SEIFA) of Relative Socio-economic Advantage/Disadvantage was used to assign a socioeconomic index score to each child's neighbourhood, based on postcode. Participant addresses were geocoded using a Geographic Information System. The Open Space 2002 spatial data set was used to identify all POS within an 800 m radius of each participant's home. The features of each of these POS (1497) were audited. Variability of POS features was examined across quintiles of neighbourhood SEIFA. Compared with POS in lower socioeconomic neighbourhoods, POS in the highest socioeconomic neighbourhoods had more amenities (e.g. picnic tables and drink fountains) and were more likely to have trees that provided shade, a water feature (e.g. pond, creek), walking and cycling paths, lighting, signage regarding dog access and signage restricting other activities. There were no differences across neighbourhoods in the number of playgrounds or the number of recreation facilities (e.g. number of sports catered for on courts and ovals, the presence of other facilities such as athletics tracks, skateboarding facility and swimming pool). This study suggests that POS in high socioeconomic neighbourhoods possess more features that are likely to promote physical activity amongst children.

Citing Articles

Twenty Four-Hour Movement Behaviours Research Among Australian Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

Hossian M, Nisar M, Mielke G, Khan A Health Promot J Austr. 2025; 36(2):e70021.

PMID: 39967550 PMC: 11836639. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.70021.


Understanding factors influencing the use of specialized outdoor fitness equipment among older adults in Australia.

Paudel C, Timperio A, Loh V, Salmon J, Deforche B, Veitch J Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39588731 PMC: 11589461. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae160.


Influence of park visitation on physical activity, well-being and social connectedness among Australians during COVID-19.

Rivera E, Arundell L, Parker K, Veitch J, Salmon J, Ridgers N Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(5).

PMID: 39436759 PMC: 11495220. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae137.


Perception of urban green space among university students in Bangladesh.

Saha B, Haq S PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0311033.

PMID: 39348395 PMC: 11441694. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311033.


Applying systems thinking in youth-centred participatory action research for health promotion in an underserved neighbourhood.

Emke H, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C, Luna Pinzon A, Stronks K, Waterlander W Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1272663.

PMID: 38887247 PMC: 11180748. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1272663.