Objective:
To report a live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carriers of complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) with translocation and deletion.
Design:
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied to PGD for CCR carriers.
Setting:
University-based centers for reproductive medicine.
Patient(s):
Three CCR carriers, patient A with 46,XX,t(6;10;8)(q25.1;q21.1;q21.1), patient B with 46,X,del(X)(p22.3),t(2;18)(q14.1;q21)[48]/45,X, t(2;18)(q14.1;q21)[12], and patient C with 46,XY,t(5;13;8)(q21.2;q14.3;q24.3).
Intervention(s):
Balanced or normal embryos were diagnosed by PGD and transferred.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Diagnosis rate of FISH, pregnancy outcome, and karyotype of amniocentesis.
Result(s):
Blastomeres were biopsied from 56 embryos in four PGD cycles, and 54 embryos (96.4%) were successfully diagnosed by FISH. Among them, four embryos were diagnosed as transferable in two cycles of patient B and one cycle of patient C. After three cycles of embryo transfer, a pregnancy was achieved in the second PGD cycle of patient B, and the karyotype of amniocentesis was 46,XY,t(2;18)(q14.1;q21). A healthy baby was delivered at 40 weeks of gestation by cesarean section.
Conclusion(s):
This is the first report for a live birth after PGD in the CCR carriers associated with translocation and deletion, 46,X,del(X)(p22.3),t(2;18)(q14.1;q21)[48]/45,X,t(2;18)(q14.1;q21)[12]. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for CCRs needs more consideration and advanced techniques for full karyotyping.
Citing Articles
Successful pregnancy in a complex chromosomal rearrangement carrier using preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements: A case report.
Wang Y, Ke X, Liang X, Ouyang X, Yang X, Wang F
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(5):e41327.
PMID: 39889149
PMC: 11789875.
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041327.
Complex chromosomal rearrangements in female carriers experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss or poor obstetric history and literature review.
Sheth F, Shah J, Liehr T, Desai M, Patel H, Sheth J
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(1):39-62.
PMID: 39543058
PMC: 11806180.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03316-1.
Preimplantation genetic testing for complex chromosomal rearrangements: clinical outcomes and potential risk factors.
Liu D, Chen C, Huang Q, Dong Y, Xu L, Dong M
Front Genet. 2024; 15:1401549.
PMID: 39139821
PMC: 11320417.
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1401549.
Case report: Optical genome mapping revealed double rearrangements in a male undergoing preimplantation genetic testing.
Ren J, Keqie Y, Li Y, Li L, Luo M, Gao M
Front Genet. 2023; 14:1132404.
PMID: 37065489
PMC: 10102332.
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1132404.
A novel male 2;4;14 complex chromosomal translocation with normal semen parameters but 100% embryonic aneuploidy.
Mas J, Sabouni R, Bocca S
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(5):907-912.
PMID: 29380280
PMC: 5984877.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1126-4.
Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS.
Frumkin T, Peleg S, Gold V, Reches A, Asaf S, Azem F
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(8):1095-1100.
PMID: 28555358
PMC: 5533684.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0954-y.
A family study of complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 8, and 11 and its reproductive consequences.
Trpchevska N, Dimova I, Arabadji T, Milachich T, Angelova S, Dimitrova M
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(5):659-669.
PMID: 28236108
PMC: 5427656.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0893-7.
Identification of a balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 3, 18 and 21 with recurrent abortion: case report.
Liao Y, Wang L, Zhang D, Liu C
Mol Cytogenet. 2014; 7:39.
PMID: 24959204
PMC: 4066826.
DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-39.
Presentation and treatment of subfertile men with balanced translocations: the cleveland clinic experience.
Ching C, Ko E, Hecht B, Smith M, Sabanegh E
Curr Urol. 2014; 6(1):37-42.
PMID: 24917708
PMC: 3783302.
DOI: 10.1159/000338868.
A Rare De novo Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement (CCR) Involving Four Chromosomes in An Oligo-asthenosperm Infertile Man.
Asia S, Vaziri Nasab H, Sabbaghian M, Kalantari H, Zari Moradi S, Gourabi H
Cell J. 2014; 16(3):377-82.
PMID: 24611143
PMC: 4204197.
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of day 4 and 5 embryo transfer cycles.
Lee S, Lee H, Lim C, Park Y, Yang K, Park D
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2013; 40(3):122-5.
PMID: 24179869
PMC: 3811723.
DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2013.40.3.122.
Meiotic outcomes of three-way translocations ascertained in cleavage-stage embryos: refinement of reproductive risks and implications for PGD.
Scriven P, Bint S, Davies A, Ogilvie C
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013; 22(6):748-53.
PMID: 24129433
PMC: 4023212.
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.237.
Sequential FISH allows the determination of the segregation outcome and the presence of numerical anomalies in spermatozoa from a t(1;8;2)(q42;p21;p15) carrier.
Godo A, Blanco J, Vidal F, Parriego M, Boada M, Anton E
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013; 30(9):1115-23.
PMID: 23975190
PMC: 3800523.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0063-5.
Constitutional complex chromosomal rearrangements in a klinefelter patient: case report and review of literature.
Mahjoubi F, Razazian F
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012; 29(5):437-41.
PMID: 22382640
PMC: 3348273.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9725-y.
The use of fluorescent in situ hybridization in male infertility.
Hwang K, Weedin J, Lamb D
Ther Adv Urol. 2011; 2(4):157-69.
PMID: 21789092
PMC: 3126079.
DOI: 10.1177/1756287210373758.
Complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 4 and 22 in an infertile male: case report and literature review.
Salahshourifar I, Shahrokhshahi N, Tavakolzadeh T, Beheshti Z, Gourabi H
J Appl Genet. 2009; 50(1):69-72.
PMID: 19193986
DOI: 10.1007/BF03195655.