» Articles » PMID: 18074491

Gastric Tube Volume After Duodenal Switch and Its Correlation to Short-term Weight Loss

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2007 Dec 13
PMID 18074491
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bariatric operations may have a restrictive and a malabsorptive component. The restrictive component is considered key for short-term weight loss. However, there are important volume discrepancies between gastric reservoirs in different bariatric surgical techniques, which questions the real meaning of the restrictive part of the operation. We have investigated the relationship between residual gastric volume after sleeve gastrectomy in duodenal switch (DS) and weight loss over the first postoperative year.

Methods: 14 patients submitted to a modified DS and one patient submitted to a sleeve gastrectomy were studied. All patients had an abdominal CT performed between the third and the ninth postoperative month to measure residual gastric volume. Gastric tube volume was correlated to early postoperative weight loss.

Results: Mean excess BMI loss was 75% at 12 months. Mean gastric tube volume was 208 cc. Gastric volume was not related to preoperative weight or BMI; instead, it was directly related to patient's height. There was no statistical relation between gastric volume and weight loss at 3, 6, 9 or 12 months after the operation.

Conclusion: After DS, gastric tube volume is not directly related to weight changes. Other factors could have influence on intake restriction, such as gastric tube compliance or different mechanisms of satiety induction, because no differences in weight loss were observed between narrow tubes and wider ones, despite important variations in volume.

Citing Articles

Residual Gastric Volume Relationship and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Dogan S, Onmez A, Cetin M, Ozaydin I, Pehlivan M Obes Surg. 2020; 30(5):1929-1934.

PMID: 31953743 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04417-3.


How to Switch to the Switch: Implementation of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch into Practice.

Halawani H, Antanavicius G, Bonanni F Obes Surg. 2017; 27(9):2506-2509.

PMID: 28688102 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2801-8.


Excess Body Mass Index Loss at 3 Months: A Predictive Factor of Long-Term Result after Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Philouze G, Voitellier E, Lacaze L, Huet E, Gancel A, Prevost G J Obes. 2017; 2017:2107157.

PMID: 28250984 PMC: 5303591. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2107157.


Residual gastric volume estimated with a new radiological volumetric model: relationship with weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Vidal P, Ramon J, Busto M, Dominguez-Vega G, Goday A, Pera M Obes Surg. 2013; 24(3):359-63.

PMID: 24242920 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-1113-x.


Gastric emptying and postprandial PYY response after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

Hedberg J, Hedenstrom H, Anders Karlsson F, Eden-Engstrom B, Sundbom M Obes Surg. 2010; 21(5):609-15.

PMID: 20862615 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-010-0288-7.


References
1.
OBrien P, McPhail T, Chaston T, Dixon J . Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006; 16(8):1032-40. DOI: 10.1381/096089206778026316. View

2.
Naslund , Backman , Granstrom , Stockeld . Does the Size of the Upper Pouch Affect Weight Loss after Vertical Banded Gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 1995; 5(4):378-381. DOI: 10.1381/096089295765557430. View

3.
Han S, Kim W, Oh J . Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at 1 year in morbidly obese Korean patients. Obes Surg. 2005; 15(10):1469-75. DOI: 10.1381/096089205774859227. View

4.
Langer F, Bohdjalian A, Felberbauer F, Fleischmann E, Reza Hoda M, Ludvik B . Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity?. Obes Surg. 2006; 16(2):166-71. DOI: 10.1381/096089206775565276. View

5.
Forsell , Hellers , Laveskog , Westman . Validation of Pouch Size Measurement Following the Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding Using Endoscopy, MRI and Barium Swallow. Obes Surg. 1996; 6(6):463-467. DOI: 10.1381/096089296765556340. View