» Articles » PMID: 18069128

Managing Patient Dose in Multi-detector Computed Tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102

Overview
Journal Ann ICRP
Date 2007 Dec 11
PMID 18069128
Citations 150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) technology has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of increasing numbers of multiple detector arrays. There are several parameters specific to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners that increase or decrease patient dose systematically compared to older single detector computed tomography (SDCT) scanners. This document briefly reviews the MDCT technology, radiation dose in MDCT, including differences from SDCT and factors that affect dose, radiation risks, and the responsibilities for patient dose management. The document recommends that users need to understand the relationship between patient dose and image quality and be aware that image quality in CT is often higher than that necessary for diagnostic confidence. Automatic exposure control (AEC) does not totally free the operator from selection of scan parameters, and awareness of individual systems is important. Scanning protocols cannot simply be transferred between scanners from different manufacturers and should be determined for each MDCT. If the image quality is appropriately specified by the user, and suited to the clinical task, there will be a reduction in patient dose for most patients. Understanding of some parameters is not intuitive and the selection of image quality parameter values in AEC systems is not straightforward. Examples of some clinical situation shave been included to demonstrate dose management, e.g. CT examinations of the chest, the heart for coronary calcium quantification and non-invasive coronary angiography, colonography, the urinary tract, children, pregnant patients, trauma cases, and CT guided interventions. CT is increasingly being used to replace conventional x-ray studies and it is important that patient dose is given careful consideration, particularly with repeated or multiple examinations.

Citing Articles

Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Head CT Imaging in the Madina Region, Saudi Arabia.

Alhujaili S, Alshabibi A, Alafer F, Alrowaili Z, Salah H, Sulieman A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767242 PMC: 11675420. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242882.


Automated Measurement of Effective Radiation Dose by F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Eom Y, Park Y, Lee S, Lee S, An Y, Park B Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2144-2157.

PMID: 39728913 PMC: 11679132. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120151.


Optimization of abdominal CT based on a model of total risk minimization by putting radiation risk in perspective with imaging benefit.

Ria F, Zhang A, Lerebours R, Erkanli A, Abadi E, Marin D Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):272.

PMID: 39702791 PMC: 11659579. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00674-w.


Effect of Spectral Filtering and Segmental X-ray Tube Current Switch-Off on Interventionalist's Scatter Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy.

Grosser O, Volk M, Georgiades M, Punzet D, Alsawalhi B, Kupitz D Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199796 PMC: 11351108. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080838.


Radiation Doses in Routine CT Examinations for Adult Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

Alenazi K Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64646.

PMID: 39149685 PMC: 11325851. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64646.