Muscle [phosphocreatine] Dynamics Following the Onset of Exercise in Humans: the Influence of Baseline Work-rate
Overview
Affiliations
The kinetics of pulmonary O(2) uptake is known to be substantially slower when exercise is initiated from a baseline of lower-intensity exercise rather than from rest. However, it is not known whether putative intracellular regulators of mitochondrial respiration (and in particular the phosphocreatine concentration, [PCr]) show similar non-linearities in their response dynamics. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of baseline metabolic rate on muscle [PCr] kinetics (as assessed using (31)P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy) following the onset of exercise. Seven male subjects completed 'step' tests to heavy-intensity exercise (80% of peak work-rate) from a resting baseline and also from a baseline of moderate-intensity exercise (40% of peak work-rate) using a single-leg knee-extensor ergometer situated inside the bore of a 1.5 T super-conducting magnet. The time constant describing the kinetics of the initial exponential-like fall in [PCr] was significantly different between rest-to-moderate (25 +/- 14 s), rest-to-heavy (48 +/- 11 s) and moderate-to-heavy exercise (95 +/- 40 s) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). A delayed-onset 'slow component' in the [PCr] response was observed in all subjects during rest-to-heavy exercise, but was attenuated in the moderate-to-heavy exercise condition. These data indicate that muscle [PCr] kinetics does not conform to 'linear, first-order' behaviour during dynamic exercise, and thus have implications for understanding the regulation of muscle oxidative metabolism.
Francescato M, Cettolo V Exp Physiol. 2023; 109(3):393-404.
PMID: 37983192 PMC: 10988721. DOI: 10.1113/EP091146.
Identification of Non-Invasive Exercise Thresholds: Methods, Strategies, and an Online App.
Keir D, Iannetta D, Maturana F, Kowalchuk J, Murias J Sports Med. 2021; 52(2):237-255.
PMID: 34694596 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01581-z.
An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity.
Jamnick N, Pettitt R, Granata C, Pyne D, Bishop D Sports Med. 2020; 50(10):1729-1756.
PMID: 32729096 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8.
Salvador P, Schafer L, Grassi B, Guglielmo L, Denadai B Front Physiol. 2019; 10:471.
PMID: 31073291 PMC: 6495266. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00471.
Beltrame T, Amelard R, Wong A, Hughson R J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017; 124(2):473-481.
PMID: 28596271 PMC: 5867367. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00299.2017.