» Articles » PMID: 18061172

Neovagina Creation in Vaginal Agenesis: Development of a New Laparoscopic Vecchietti-based Procedure and Optimized Instruments in a Prospective Comparative Interventional Study in 101 Patients

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2007 Dec 7
PMID 18061172
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To improve the laparoscopic Vecchietti procedure and optimize instrumentation for treatment of congenital vaginal agenesis with a minimum of complications and optimal functional outcome, in comparison with the conventional laparoscopic Vecchietti procedure.

Design: Prospective comparative interventional study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): One hundred one patients with congenital vaginal agenesis.

Intervention(s): The interventions compared were [1] a new laparoscopic, Vecchietti-based method using vaginoabdominal blunt perforation without vesicorectal tunneling and [2] the laparoscopic Vecchietti procedure.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Duration of surgery and traction, functional results, surgical and technical complications.

Result(s): Without tunneling and with new instruments, mean operative time was more than halved, from 113.0 to 47.5 minutes, with a significantly reduced complication rate for bladder lesions and no bowel lesions. Mean traction time was similarly reduced, from 11.7 to 4.8 days. No instrument-related complications were seen with our new instrument set. After 6 months, the longer neovagina of 10.6 cm that was achieved with the new method was still 2.5 cm longer than the conventional result. No patients needed lubricants or had sustained pain during intercourse.

Conclusion(s): Our new method for neovagina creation resulted in shorter operation and traction times, better functional results, and fewer surgical complications and no technical ones. It is therefore a safer, shorter, more effective, and less traumatic procedure.

Citing Articles

Davydov Vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Patient Presenting With Urethral Dilatation.

Vitols J, Lidaka L Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 2024:9498667.

PMID: 38962289 PMC: 11221995. DOI: 10.1155/2024/9498667.


A Bibliometric and Visualisation Analysis on the Research of Female Genital Plastic Surgery Based on the Web of Science Core Collection Database.

Zhang X, Li B, Mao J, Richolsik , Zhang R, Faiz S Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48(15):2975-2993.

PMID: 38671242 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03983-6.


Long term sexual outcomes of Mayer Rokitansky Küster Hauser Syndrome patients after Uncu-modified Davydov procedure.

Aslan K, Gurbuz T, Orhan A, Kasapoglu I, Ozerkan K, Uncu G Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023; 15(3):235-242.

PMID: 37742200 PMC: 10643009. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.15.3.091.


Endometriosis in Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser-Syndrome-Histological Evaluation of Uterus Remnants and Peritoneal Lesions and Comparison to Samples from Endometriosis Patients without Mullerian Anomaly.

Steinmacher S, Bosmuller H, Granai M, Koch A, Brucker S, Rall K J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362689 PMC: 9655844. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216458.


Uterine allograft removal by total laparoscopic hysterectomy after successful cesarean delivery in a living-donor uterus recipient with uterovaginal agenesis (MRKHS).

Brucker S, Kramer B, Abele H, Henes M, Hoopmann M, Scholler D Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 307(3):827-840.

PMID: 36342536 PMC: 9984324. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06796-7.