» Articles » PMID: 18056814

The Hidden Structure of Overimitation

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Dec 7
PMID 18056814
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Young children are surprisingly judicious imitators, but there are also times when their reproduction of others' actions appears strikingly illogical. For example, children who observe an adult inefficiently operating a novel object frequently engage in what we term overimitation, persistently reproducing the adult's unnecessary actions. Although children readily overimitate irrelevant actions that even chimpanzees ignore, this curious effect has previously attracted little interest; it has been assumed that children overimitate not for theoretically significant reasons, but rather as a purely social exercise. In this paper, however, we challenge this view, presenting evidence that overimitation reflects a more fundamental cognitive process. We show that children who observe an adult intentionally manipulating a novel object have a strong tendency to encode all of the adult's actions as causally meaningful, implicitly revising their causal understanding of the object accordingly. This automatic causal encoding process allows children to rapidly calibrate their causal beliefs about even the most opaque physical systems, but it also carries a cost. When some of the adult's purposeful actions are unnecessary-even transparently so-children are highly prone to mis-encoding them as causally significant. The resulting distortions in children's causal beliefs are the true cause of overimitation, a fact that makes the effect remarkably resistant to extinction. Despite countervailing task demands, time pressure, and even direct warnings, children are frequently unable to avoid reproducing the adult's irrelevant actions because they have already incorporated them into their representation of the target object's causal structure.

Citing Articles

Effects of Joint Action Observation on Children's Imitation.

Rizvanovic N, Kiraly I, Sebanz N Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001839 PMC: 11851644. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020208.


The technical-reasoning network is recruited when people observe others make or teach how to make tools: An fMRI study.

Bluet A, Reynaud E, Federico G, Bryche C, Lesourd M, Fournel A iScience. 2025; 28(2):111870.

PMID: 39995878 PMC: 11848787. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111870.


Dogs with prior experience of a task still overimitate their caregiver.

Mackie L, Huber L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20806.

PMID: 39242613 PMC: 11379846. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70700-3.


3.3 million years of stone tool complexity suggests that cumulative culture began during the Middle Pleistocene.

Paige J, Perreault C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(26):e2319175121.

PMID: 38885385 PMC: 11214059. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319175121.


Variability and harshness shape flexible strategy-use in support of the constrained flexibility framework.

Pope-Caldwell S, Deffner D, Maurits L, Neumann T, Haun D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7236.

PMID: 38538731 PMC: 10973413. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57800-w.


References
1.
Gergely G, Csibra G . Teleological reasoning in infancy: the nai;ve theory of rational action. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(7):287-292. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00128-1. View

2.
Horner V, Whiten A . Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Anim Cogn. 2004; 8(3):164-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6. View

3.
Meltzoff A . Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. Dev Psychol. 2014; 31(5):838-850. PMC: 4137788. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838. View

4.
Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M . Understanding "prior intentions" enables two-year-olds to imitatively learn a complex task. Child Dev. 2002; 73(5):1431-41. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00481. View

5.
Whiten A, Custance D, Gomez J, Teixidor P, Bard K . Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1996; 110(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.3. View