» Articles » PMID: 18056488

Immediate Mobilization Compared with Conventional Immobilization for the Impacted Nonoperatively Treated Proximal Humeral Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2007 Dec 7
PMID 18056488
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There have been few randomized controlled trials evaluating nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. To investigate shortening the period of dependence, we assessed the feasibility and efficacy of early mobilization of the shoulder (within three days after the fracture) in comparison with those of conventional three-week immobilization followed by physiotherapy.

Methods: We randomly assigned seventy-four patients with an impacted proximal humeral fracture to receive early passive mobilization or conventional treatment. The primary outcome was the overall shoulder functional status (as measured with the Constant score) at three months. The secondary outcomes were the Constant score at six weeks and at six months, the change in pain (on a visual analog scale), and the active and passive range of motion.

Results: At three months and at six weeks, the early mobilization group had a significantly better Constant score than did the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 9.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 17.8] [p = 0.02] and 10.1 [95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 18.1] [p = 0.02], respectively) and better active mobility in forward elevation (between-group difference, 12.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 22.4] [p = 0.02] and 28.1 [95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 49.1] [p = 0.01], respectively). At three months, the early mobilization group had significantly reduced pain compared with the conventional-treatment group (between-group difference, 15.7 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 30.8] [p = 0.04]). No complications in displacement or nonhealing were noted.

Conclusions: Early mobilization for impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fractures is safe and is more effective for quickly restoring the physical capability and performance of the injured arm than is conventional immobilization followed by physiotherapy.

Citing Articles

Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Cohen A, Reijman M, Kraan G, Baart S, Verhaar J, Colaris J J Orthop Traumatol. 2025; 26(1):14.

PMID: 40044935 PMC: 11883040. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00822-5.


Early versus delayed mobilisation for non-surgically treated proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Challoumas D, Minhas H, Bagni S, Millar N BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):203.

PMID: 40016664 PMC: 11866563. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08371-y.


How long is the arm immobilised after a conservatively managed displaced proximal humerus fracture and does early mobilisation effect complication rates: A systematic review.

Tunnicliffe H, Divall P, ONeill S, Singh H, Wright D Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241239011.

PMID: 39552671 PMC: 11562216. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241239011.


Rehabilitation protocols in proximal humerus fracture management: A systematic review.

Budharaju A, Hones K, Hao K, Wright J, Fedorka C, Kaar S Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(4):449-458.

PMID: 39346799 PMC: 11437559. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231182374.


Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.

Paksoy A, Akgun D, Imiolczyk J, Gebauer H, Lacheta L, Scheibel M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):752.

PMID: 39304857 PMC: 11414188. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07870-8.