» Articles » PMID: 18046645

Chemo-embolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Different Sizes of Embolization Particles

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2007 Nov 30
PMID 18046645
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the size responses and vascular responses to three different sizes of Embosphere (EMBS) embolization particles used for chemo-embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Forty-seven patients with biopsy proven HCC treated with TACE using EMBS (Biosphere Medical, Rockland, MA, USA) were included in this study. EMBS are non-resorbable tris-acryl gelatin defined-size microspheres. Sixteen patients were treated with 40-120 micron (40-microm), 13 patients with 100-300 (100-microm), and 18 patients with 300-500 (300-microm) EMBS particles. We measured the two-dimensional area and vascularity of the tumor index lesion on initial and subsequent CTs after treatment. Lesions were classified into four grades based on the degree of vascularity measured in 25% increments. Size of tumor after one treatment decreased by an average (avg) of 18% for 40-120-microm particles, 38% for 100-300-microm particles, and 17% for 300-500-microm particles. After three treatments, size decreased by an avg of 46% for 40-120-microm particles, 76% for 100-300-microm particles, and 46% for 300-500-microm particles. Vascularity decrease was also measured after the first and third treatments, and defined as a decrease of one or more grades in tumor vascularity. Results were as follows (% of patients with decrease). For 40-120-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 53% and 88% of patients. For 100-300-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 60% and 88% of patients. For 300-500-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 50% and 57% of patients. It was concluded the 100-300-microm EMBS particles produce slightly higher responses.

Citing Articles

Clinical Study on the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Embolization of Prostate Artery Based on Embosphere Microspheres and Gelatin Sponge Granules.

Liu J, Shi D, Li L, Cao L, Liu J, He J J Healthc Eng. 2022; 2022:1424021.

PMID: 35126897 PMC: 8808190. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1424021.


Current trends and perspectives in interventional radiology for gastrointestinal cancers.

Reitano E, DeAngelis N, Bianchi G, Laera L, Spiliopoulos S, Calbi R World J Radiol. 2021; 13(10):314-326.

PMID: 34786187 PMC: 8567440. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v13.i10.314.


Super-Selective Transarterial Chemoembolization with Doxorubicin-Loaded Drug-Eluting Beads Sized Below and Above 100 Microns in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study.

Balli H, Aksungur E, Khalatai B, Aikimbaev K J Belg Soc Radiol. 2019; 103(1):47.

PMID: 31531413 PMC: 6676920. DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.1841.


Current status of embolic agents for liver tumor embolization.

Osuga K, Maeda N, Higashihara H, Hori S, Nakazawa T, Tanaka K Int J Clin Oncol. 2012; 17(4):306-15.

PMID: 22806426 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-012-0445-1.


Interventional radiology and the care of the oncology patient.

ONeill S, OConnor O, Ryan M, Maher M Radiol Res Pract. 2011; 2011:160867.

PMID: 22091374 PMC: 3196980. DOI: 10.1155/2011/160867.


References
1.
Breedis C, Young G . The blood supply of neoplasms in the liver. Am J Pathol. 1954; 30(5):969-77. PMC: 1942491. View

2.
Ganne-Carrie N, Trinchet J . Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 16(3):275-81. DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200403000-00005. View

3.
Yamada R, Sato M, Kawabata M, Nakatsuka H, Nakamura K, Takashima S . Hepatic artery embolization in 120 patients with unresectable hepatoma. Radiology. 1983; 148(2):397-401. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.2.6306721. View

4.
Yao F, Bass N, Nikolai B, Merriman R, Davern T, Kerlan R . A follow-up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy. Liver Transpl. 2003; 9(7):684-92. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50147. View

5.
Yao F, Ferrell L, Bass N, Bacchetti P, Ascher N, Roberts J . Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the proposed UCSF criteria with the Milan criteria and the Pittsburgh modified TNM criteria. Liver Transpl. 2002; 8(9):765-74. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34892. View