» Articles » PMID: 18041491

Automatic Analysis of Single-channel Sleep EEG: Validation in Healthy Individuals

Overview
Journal Sleep
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2007 Nov 29
PMID 18041491
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: To assess the performance of automatic sleep scoring software (ASEEGA) based on a single EEG channel comparatively with manual scoring (2 experts) of conventional full polysomnograms.

Design: Polysomnograms from 15 healthy individuals were scored by 2 independent experts using conventional R&K rules. The results were compared to those of ASEEGA scoring on an epoch-by-epoch basis.

Setting: Sleep laboratory in the physiology department of a teaching hospital.

Participants: Fifteen healthy volunteers.

Measurements And Results: The epoch-by-epoch comparison was based on classifying into 2 states (wake/sleep), 3 states (wake/REM/ NREM), 4 states (wake/REM/stages 1-2/SWS), or 5 states (wake/REM/ stage 1/stage 2/SWS). The obtained overall agreements, as quantified by the kappa coefficient, were 0.82, 0.81, 0.75, and 0.72, respectively. Furthermore, obtained agreements between ASEEGA and the expert consensual scoring were 96.0%, 92.1%, 84.9%, and 82.9%, respectively. Finally, when classifying into 5 states, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of ASEEGA regarding wakefulness were 82.5% and 89.7%, respectively. Similarly, sensitivity and positive predictive value regarding REM state were 83.0% and 89.1%.

Conclusions: Our results establish the face validity and convergent validity of ASEEGA for single-channel sleep analysis in healthy individuals. ASEEGA appears as a good candidate for diagnostic aid and automatic ambulant scoring.

Citing Articles

REM sleep quality is associated with balanced tonic activity of the locus coeruleus during wakefulness.

Mortazavi N, Talwar P, Koshmanova E, Sharifpour R, Beckers E, Berger A J Biomed Sci. 2025; 32(1):35.

PMID: 40069818 PMC: 11900061. DOI: 10.1186/s12929-025-01127-9.


Explainable vision transformer for automatic visual sleep staging on multimodal PSG signals.

Lee H, Choi Y, Lee H, Jeong J, Hong J, Shin H NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):55.

PMID: 39863774 PMC: 11762271. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01378-0.


Impact of Varying Sleep Pressure on Daytime Sleep Propensity in Healthy Young and Older Adults.

de Haan S, Dourte M, Deantoni M, Reyt M, Baillet M, Berthomier C Clocks Sleep. 2025; 7(1.

PMID: 39846530 PMC: 11755553. DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep7010002.


Performance Investigation of Somfit Sleep Staging Algorithm.

McMahon M, Goldin J, Kealy E, Wicks D, Zilberg E, Freeman W Nat Sci Sleep. 2024; 16:1027-1043.

PMID: 39071546 PMC: 11277903. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S463026.


Automatic Wake and Deep-Sleep Stage Classification Based on Wigner-Ville Distribution Using a Single Electroencephalogram Signal.

Yeh P, Ozgoren M, Chen H, Chiang Y, Lee J, Chiang Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535001 PMC: 10968804. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060580.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Fischer Y, Junge-Hulsing B, Rettinger G, Panis A . The use of an ambulatory, automatic sleep recording device (QUISI version 1.0) in the evaluation of primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004; 29(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00759.x. View

3.
Stanus E, Lacroix B, Kerkhofs M, Mendlewicz J . Automated sleep scoring: a comparative reliability study of two algorithms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987; 66(4):448-56. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90214-8. View

4.
Agarwal R, Gotman J . Computer-assisted sleep staging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002; 48(12):1412-23. DOI: 10.1109/10.966600. View

5.
Mann K, Roschke J . Different phase relationships between EEG frequency bands during NREM and REM sleep. Sleep. 1997; 20(9):753-6. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/20.9.753. View