» Articles » PMID: 18032068

Interpreting Scan Data Acquired from Multiple Scanners: a Study with Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2007 Nov 23
PMID 18032068
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large, multi-site studies utilizing MRI-derived measures from multiple scanners present an opportunity to advance research by pooling data. On the other hand, it remains unclear whether or not the potential confound introduced by different scanners and upgrades will devalue the integrity of any results. Although there are studies of scanner differences for the purpose of calibration and quality control, the current literature is devoid of studies that describe the analysis of multi-scanner data with regard to the interaction of scanner(s) with effects of interest. We investigated a data-set of 136 subjects, 62 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and 74 cognitively normal elderly controls, with MRI scans from one center that were acquired over 10 years with 6 different scanners and multiple upgrades over time. We used a whole-brain voxel-wise analysis to evaluate the effect of scanner, effect of disease, and the interaction of scanner and disease for the 6 different scanners. The effect of disease in patients showed the expected significant reduction of grey matter in the medial temporal lobe. Scanner differences were substantially less than the group differences and only significant in the thalamus. There was no significant interaction of scanner with disease group. We describe the rationale for concluding that our results were not confounded by scanner differences. Similar analyses in other multi-scanner data-sets could be used to justify the pooling of data when needed, such as in studies of rare disorders or in multi-center designs.

Citing Articles

Does Scanner Choice Matter for the Design of Foot Orthosis?.

Chhikara K, Suresh S, Morrison S, Hartley D, Evans K, Wille M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943509 PMC: 11820986. DOI: 10.3390/s25030869.


Let's focus on the insula in addiction: A refined anatomical exploration of insula in severe alcohol and cocaine use disorders.

Billaux P, Segobin S, Maillard A, Bloch V, Delmaire C, Cabe N Eur Psychiatry. 2024; 67(1):e75.

PMID: 39543913 PMC: 11730057. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1784.


Introspection of UBNIN and Modified-UBNIN Algorithms for Structural MRI. Reply to Kelly et al. A Comparison of Brain-State Representations of Binary Neuroimaging Connectivity Data. Comment on "Samantaray et al. Unique Brain Network Identification....

Samantaray T, Anand M, Saini J, Gupta C Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790403 PMC: 11117835. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050424.


White matter trajectories over the lifespan.

Conte S, Zimmerman D, Richards J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0301520.

PMID: 38758830 PMC: 11101104. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301520.


Structural deviations of the posterior fossa and the cerebellum and their cognitive links in a neurodevelopmental deletion syndrome.

Sefik E, Duan K, Li Y, Sholar B, Evans L, Pincus J Mol Psychiatry. 2024; 29(11):3395-3411.

PMID: 38744992 PMC: 11541222. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02584-8.


References
1.
Mueller S, Weiner M, Thal L, Petersen R, Jack C, Jagust W . The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006; 15(4):869-77, xi-xii. PMC: 2376747. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008. View

2.
Wahlund L, Almkvist O, Blennow K, Engedahl K, Johansson A, Waldemar G . Evidence-based evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool in dementia workup. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 16(6):427-37. DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000245463.36148.12. View

3.
Ashburner J, Friston K . Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(3):839-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018. View

4.
van Haren N, Cahn W, Hulshoff Pol H, Schnack H, Caspers E, Lemstra A . Brain volumes as predictor of outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia: a multi-center MRI study. Schizophr Res. 2003; 64(1):41-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00018-5. View

5.
Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, Haley E, van der Kouwe A, Gollub R . Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage. 2005; 30(2):436-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.046. View