» Articles » PMID: 18027077

A Method to Provide a More Efficient and Reliable Measure of Self-report Physical Work Capacity for Patients with Spinal Pain

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Nov 21
PMID 18027077
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Self-report measures of functional ability are commonly used in occupational rehabilitation to measure the current status of an individual and his or her progress in response to intervention. Most of these measures have been developed using classical test theory that does not provide calibration of the items. Methods of test development that originated in the field of Education have been applied recently to healthcare measures, providing item calibration and allowing proportional evaluation of total scores. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the application of these methods in the revision of an existing self-report measure. The potential value of these methods to improve established measures is demonstrated.

Citing Articles

Validity of the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile.

Verna J, Matheson L, Scherer S, Mayer J J Occup Rehabil. 2019; 29(4):822-831.

PMID: 31201594 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09842-5.


Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the Hand Function Sort (HFS©) for French speaking patients with upper limb complaints.

Konzelmann M, Burrus C, Hilfiker R, Rivier G, Deriaz O, Luthi F J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 25(1):18-24.

PMID: 24839002 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9514-9.


Development and reliability testing of Spanish language and english language versions of the multidimensional task ability profile.

Verna J, Matheson L, Gables S, Hause R, Mayer J J Occup Rehabil. 2012; 23(2):220-7.

PMID: 23065195 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9395-8.


Twenty years of multidisciplinary research and practice: the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation then and now.

Shaw W, Findley P, Feuerstein M J Occup Rehabil. 2011; 21(4):449-54.

PMID: 22065200 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9339-8.


Measuring clients' perception of functional limitations using the Perceived Functioning & Health questionnaire.

Schellekens J, Abma F, Mulders H, Brouwer S J Occup Rehabil. 2010; 20(4):512-25.

PMID: 20352302 PMC: 2980635. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9236-6.


References
1.
Bode R, Lai J, Dineen K, Heinemann A, Shevrin D, Von Roenn J . Expansion of a physical function item bank and development of an abbreviated form for clinical research. J Appl Meas. 2005; 7(1):1-15. View

2.
Chiu Y, Fritz S, Light K, Velozo C . Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the dynamic gait index. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(6):778-87. View

3.
Coster W, Haley S, Jette A, Tao W, Siebens H . Predictors of basic and instrumental activities of daily living performance in persons receiving rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(7):928-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.037. View

4.
McHorney C, Monahan P . Postscript: Applications of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care. 2004; 42(1 Suppl):I73-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103523.11202.9a. View

5.
McHorney C, Haley S, Ware Jr J . Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(4):451-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00424-6. View