Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome with Adjuvant Tamoxifen Relative to Patient CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The clinical outcome of tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients may be influenced by the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes that catalyze the formation of antiestrogenic metabolites endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen. We investigated the predictive value of genetic variants of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and three other cytochrome P450 enzymes for tamoxifen treatment outcome.
Patients And Methods: DNA from 206 patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and from 280 patients not receiving tamoxifen therapy (71 months median follow-up) was isolated from archival material and was genotyped for 16 polymorphisms of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP3A5 by matrix-assisted, laser desorption/ionization, time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and by copy number quantification. Risk and survival estimates were calculated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses.
Results: Tamoxifen-treated patients carrying the CYP2D6 alleles *4, *5, *10, *41-all associated with impaired formation of antiestrogenic metabolites-had significantly more recurrences of breast cancer, shorter relapse-free periods (hazard ratio [HR], 2.24; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.33; P = .02), and worse event-free survival rates (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.25; P = .02) compared with carriers of functional alleles. Patients with the CYP2C19 high enzyme activity promoter variant *17 had a more favorable clinical outcome (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.92; P = .03) than carriers of *1, *2, and *3 alleles.
Conclusion: Because genetically determined, impaired tamoxifen metabolism results in worse treatment outcomes, genotyping for CYP2D6 alleles *4, *5, *10, and *41 can identify patients who will have little benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. In addition to functional CYP2D6 alleles, the CYP2C19 *17 variant identifies patients likely to benefit from tamoxifen.
Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer-Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management.
Davis N, Prasitlumkum N, Tan N J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.
PMID: 39768676 PMC: 11677472. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247753.
CYP2D6 Phenotype and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Bias Analysis and Meta-Analysis.
MacLehose R, Ahern T, Collin L, Li A, Lash T Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 34(2):224-233.
PMID: 39540781 PMC: 11802319. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0755.
Gudur R, Bhosale S, Gudur A, Kale S, More A, Datkhile K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(6):1977-1986.
PMID: 38918659 PMC: 11382849. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.6.1977.
Heterogeneity in precision oncology.
Tomasik B, Garbicz F, Braun M, Bienkowski M, Jassem J Camb Prism Precis Med. 2024; 2:e2.
PMID: 38549846 PMC: 10953762. DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2023.23.
Machine learning in onco-pharmacogenomics: a path to precision medicine with many challenges.
Mondello A, Dal Bo M, Toffoli G, Polano M Front Pharmacol. 2024; 14:1260276.
PMID: 38264526 PMC: 10803549. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1260276.