» Articles » PMID: 18004930

En Masse Retraction and Two-step Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Adult Class I Women. A Comparison of Anchorage Loss

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2007 Nov 17
PMID 18004930
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth and amount of retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth between en masse retraction and two-step retraction of the anterior teeth.

Materials And Methods: The sample consisted of 30 female adult patients with Class I malocclusion and lip protrusion who needed maximum posterior anchorage. The sample was subdivided into group 1 (n = 15, mean age = 21.4 years, en masse retraction) and group 2 (n = 15, mean age = 24.6 years, two-step retraction). Lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after treatment (T2). Nine skeletal and 10 anchorage variables were measured, and independent t-test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Although the amount of horizontal retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth was not different between the two groups, there was mild labial movement of the root apices of the upper incisors in group 2 at T2. There were no significant differences in the degree of anchorage loss of the maxillary posterior teeth between the two groups. Bodily and mesial movements of the upper molars occurred in both groups. Approximately 4 mm of the retraction of the upper incisal edges resulted from 1 mm of anchorage loss in the upper molars in both groups.

Conclusion: No significant differences existed in the degree of anchorage loss of the upper posterior teeth and the amount of retraction of the upper anterior teeth associated with en masse retraction and two-step retraction of the anterior teeth.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Simulation of Orthodontic En-Bloc Retraction Comparing Compound Technique and Sliding Mechanics Using a HOSEA Robotic Device.

Sabbagh H, Haas E, Baumert U, Seidel C, Hotzel L, Wichelhaus A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391639 PMC: 10886252. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020153.


Evaluation of the rate of anterior segment retraction in orthodontic patients with bimaxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: a single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Tawfik M, Izzat Bakhit D, El Sharaby F, Moustafa Y, Dehis H Angle Orthod. 2022; 92(6):738-745.

PMID: 35969196 PMC: 9598843. DOI: 10.2319/013022-88.1.


Which anchorage device is the best during retraction of anterior teeth? An overview of systematic reviews.

Yassir Y, Nabbat S, McIntyre G, Bearn D Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52(3):220-235.

PMID: 35418518 PMC: 9117787. DOI: 10.4041/kjod21.153.


Do orthodontists aim to decrease the duration of fixed appliance treatment?.

Abid M, Alhuwaizi A, Al-Attar A J Orthod Sci. 2021; 10:6.

PMID: 34084762 PMC: 8102932. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_36_20.


Effectiveness of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices in canine retraction and anchorage preservation during the two-step technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tian H, Xie C, Lin M, Yang H, Ren A BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):278.

PMID: 33036593 PMC: 7547464. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01271-8.