» Articles » PMID: 17996112

Socio-demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Re-presentation to an Australian Inner-city Emergency Department: Implications for Service Delivery

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Nov 13
PMID 17996112
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: People who have complex health care needs frequently access emergency departments for treatment of acute illness and injury. In particular, evidence suggests that those who are homeless, or suffer mental illness, or have a history of substance misuse, are often repeat users of emergency departments. The aim of this study was to describe the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of emergency department re-presentations. Re-presentation was defined as a return visit to the same emergency department within 28 days of discharge from hospital.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of emergency department presentations occurring over a 24-month period to an Australian inner-city hospital. Characteristics were examined for their influence on the binary outcome of re-presentation within 28 days of discharge using logistic regression with the variable patient fitted as a random effect.

Results: From 64,147 presentations to the emergency department the re-presentation rate was 18.0% (n = 11,559) of visits and 14.4% (5,894/40,942) of all patients. Median time to re-presentation was 6 days, with more than half occurring within one week of discharge (60.8%; n = 6,873), and more than three-quarters within two weeks (80.9%; n = 9,151). The odds of re-presentation increased three-fold for people who were homeless compared to those living in stable accommodation (adjusted OR 3.09; 95% CI, 2.83 to 3.36). Similarly, the odds of re-presentation were significantly higher for patients receiving a government pension compared to those who did not (adjusted OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.84), patients who left part-way through treatment compared to those who completed treatment and were discharged home (adjusted OR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.36 to 1.99), and those discharged to a residential-care facility compared to those who were discharged home (adjusted OR 1.46: 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.06).

Conclusion: Emergency department re-presentation rates cluster around one week after discharge and rapidly decrease thereafter. Housing status and being a recipient of a government pension are the most significant risk factors. Early identification and appropriate referrals for those patients who are at risk of emergency department re-presentation will assist in the development of targeted strategies to improve health service delivery to this vulnerable group.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for medication-related short-term readmissions in adults - a scoping review.

Schonenberger N, Meyer-Massetti C BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1037.

PMID: 37770912 PMC: 10536731. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10028-2.


Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With Clinical Care Pathways Reduces Emergency Department Utilization.

Lytvyak E, Sutton R, Dieleman L, Peerani F, Fedorak R, Kroeker K Crohns Colitis 360. 2023; 2(4):otaa080.

PMID: 36777757 PMC: 9802474. DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otaa080.


Premature mortality 16 years after emergency department presentation among homeless and at risk of homelessness adults: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Zordan R, Mackelprang J, Hutton J, Moore G, Sundararajan V Int J Epidemiol. 2023; 52(2):501-511.

PMID: 36752734 PMC: 10114125. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad006.


Incidence of COVID-19 Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness in the US From January 2020 to November 2021.

Meehan A, Thomas I, Horter L, Schoonveld M, Carmichael A, Kashani M JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(8):e2227248.

PMID: 35980638 PMC: 9389352. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27248.


Scoping review: Scope of practice of nurse-led services and access to care for people experiencing homelessness.

McWilliams L, Paisi M, Middleton S, Shawe J, Thornton A, Larkin M J Adv Nurs. 2022; 78(11):3587-3606.

PMID: 35894221 PMC: 9795912. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15387.


References
1.
Chan D, Chong R, Basilikas J, Mathie M, Hung W . Survey of major chronic iIlnesses and hospital admissions via the emergency department in a randomized older population in Randwick, Australia. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003; 14(4):387-92. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00343.x. View

2.
Lyratzopoulos G, Havely D, Gemmell I, Cook G . Factors influencing emergency medical readmission risk in a UK district general hospital: A prospective study. BMC Emerg Med. 2005; 5(1):1. PMC: 548275. DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-5-1. View

3.
Phillips G, Brophy D, Weiland T, Chenhall A, Dent A . The effect of multidisciplinary case management on selected outcomes for frequent attenders at an emergency department. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(12):602-6. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00412.x. View

4.
Mandelberg J, Kuhn R, Kohn M . Epidemiologic analysis of an urban, public emergency department's frequent users. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7(6):637-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02037.x. View

5.
Zook C, MOORE F . High-cost users of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1980; 302(18):996-1002. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198005013021804. View