Left Ventricular Conduction Delays Induced by Right Ventricular Apical Pacing: Effect of Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Bundle Branch Block
Overview
Physiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: RV apical pacing (RVP) may be deleterious, possibly by simulating LBBB, i.e., prolonging QRS duration (QRSd) and LV activation (LVAT). However, determinants of electrical delays are unknown.
Hypothesis: LV dysfunction (LVEF <or= 40%, HF) and pre-existing conduction system abnormalities may modulate RVP's effects, compared to LBBB.
Methods: RVP-induced QRSd and LVAT were compared in normal LV to HF, with normal QRS (<120 ms), RBBB, or LBBB. LVAT was estimated by interval from QRS onset to basal inferolateral LV depolarization.
Results: During LBBB and RVP, LVAT/QRSd was >or=85%, i.e., LVAT indicated terminal LV depolarization. In normal LV, LVAT during intrinsic conduction (55 +/- 18 ms) was delayed by RVP (129 +/- 20 ms, n = 58, P < 0.001). RVP's effects were similar to LBBB (P = NS) and unaffected by baseline conduction disease. In HF overall, RVP-induced delays (QRSd 209 +/- 27, LVAT 186 +/- 26 ms, n = 102) were greater than RVP in normal LV (P < 0.001). When baseline conduction system disease was present, RVP's effects were exaggerated (RVP wide QRS [>120 ms]: QRSd 216 +/- 27, LVAT 191 +/- 20 ms, [n = 72] vs RVP normal QRS: QRSd 193 +/- 24, LVAT 169 +/- 24 ms, n = 31, P < 0.001). In patients with LBBB (n = 41), delays during intrinsic conduction (QRSd 163 +/- 29, LVAT 137 +/- 33 ms, n = 41) were enhanced by RVP (QRSd 218 +/- 28, LVAT 191 +/- 22 ms, P < 0.001). RVP's effects were similar in patients with LBBB and RBBB (P = NS).
Conclusion: RVP simulated LBBB in normal LV. In HF, RVP induced greater conduction delays than LBBB, enhanced by accompanying conduction disease. These variations may contribute to RVP's mixed clinical effects.
Right ventricular lead sensing latency in pacemaker therapy.
Zagkli F, Kalovrenti N, Patrinos P, Chronopoulos P, Chiladakis J J Arrhythm. 2022; 38(5):756-762.
PMID: 36237850 PMC: 9535802. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12767.
Khurwolah M, Yao J, Kong X Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018; 15(2):145-155.
PMID: 30499419 PMC: 6520581. DOI: 10.2174/1573403X15666181129161839.
Contrasting electrical effects of apical vs non-apical right ventricular pacing.
Varma N Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018; 18(6):208-209.
PMID: 30391595 PMC: 6303171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.10.005.
Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?.
Di Leoni Ferrari A, Borges A, Albuquerque L, Pelzer Sussenbach C, Rosa P, Pianta R Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014; 29(3):402-13.
PMID: 25372916 PMC: 4412332. DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140104.
Stockburger M, Boveda S, Moreno J, Da Costa A, Hatala R, Brachmann J Eur Heart J. 2014; 36(3):151-7.
PMID: 25179761 PMC: 4297468. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu336.